On Apr 28, 9:40*am, Alfred stomacker
wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:03:01 -0700, Lamont Cranston



wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:35 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:
On 4/27/11 12:24 , John Smith wrote:
On 4/27/2011 10:05 AM, w spilman wrote:

...
The first document was all that is required to prove
American citizenship. Nobody lied, loser.

Confabulated and lying to the very end ... you go on record ...

With the real birth certificate (supposedly) we now can properly have
this issue examined. If a valid document, this fulfills the requirement
demanded by the Constitution, but only as far as birth proof.

The parents nationality, whether he ever surrendered citizenship, to
assume citizenship of another country, the legal questions of the
influence of his parents citizenship, etc. will all need to be examined
also, after this document has had time to be properly vetted ...

Just ending the lies of the false certification being proper has ended
... those nutjobs are now on record ...

Regards,
JS

The questions raised by the statement by the Governor of Hawaii stating
that the long form certificate did not exist

LIE.

truth

Nope, it's a lie, kooktard. As your complete inability to post a cite
PROVES.

HERE is what Abercrombie said: "It actually exists." tell us, dearie,
what is confusing to you about this?