Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 9:40*am, Alfred stomacker
wrote: On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:03:01 -0700, Lamont Cranston wrote: On 4/27/2011 10:35 AM, D Peter Maus wrote: On 4/27/11 12:24 , John Smith wrote: On 4/27/2011 10:05 AM, w spilman wrote: ... The first document was all that is required to prove American citizenship. Nobody lied, loser. Confabulated and lying to the very end ... you go on record ... With the real birth certificate (supposedly) we now can properly have this issue examined. If a valid document, this fulfills the requirement demanded by the Constitution, but only as far as birth proof. The parents nationality, whether he ever surrendered citizenship, to assume citizenship of another country, the legal questions of the influence of his parents citizenship, etc. will all need to be examined also, after this document has had time to be properly vetted ... Just ending the lies of the false certification being proper has ended ... those nutjobs are now on record ... Regards, JS The questions raised by the statement by the Governor of Hawaii stating that the long form certificate did not exist LIE. truth Nope, it's a lie, kooktard. As your complete inability to post a cite PROVES. HERE is what Abercrombie said: "It actually exists." tell us, dearie, what is confusing to you about this? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 28, 6:34*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
HERE is what Abercrombie said: "It actually exists." tell us, dearie, what is confusing to you about this? I thought I remembered that Republican Governor Linda Lingle also publicly state that she had seen it and that it exists. Democratic Governor Neil Abercrombie also claims to have known the parents at the time of his birth in Honolulu. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|