Crossband repeat
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Steve Bonine wrote: 
 As the time of year approaches to begin thinking about hurricanes and 
 disaster communications, I'm going to upgrade my 2-meter rig with one 
 that is capable of crossband repeat.  I would like for this same radio 
 to double as my in-shack equipment during normal times. 
 
 I'm looking for something with enough power to handle marginal 
 conditions, rugged and able to handle high temperatures and long duty 
 cycles, and reasonably easy to operate in the field.  (I don't mind 
 needing a computer and software to set up lots of memories, but I need 
 to be able to program in an unknown repeater in the field when the 
 computer isn't available.)  Naturally the vendors assure me that all 
 their new gear can do this, but somehow I'd rather hear it from people 
 who have actually done it in the heat of battle. 
 
 73, Steve KB9X 
 
Steve, 
 
It's always a good idea to have a rig with good capabilities, and any of  
the commercial units that advertise cross-band repeat will fill that need. 
 
I feel compelled, however, to sound a note of caution: I've been  
involved with disaster preparedness for many years, and was even on the  
Boston Esplanade helping to manage the medical responses and lost  
children during the July 4, 1976 Pops concert that drew the largest  
crowd ever recorded in Boston's history. 
 
The long and short of it is that _WE_ are the most important asset in an  
emergency and that _WE_ are most in need of preparation. If we're going  
to represent ourselves as being ready to help during times of crisis,  
then the practical knowledge and preparedness we bring with us will  
outweigh any single radio. 
 
A cross-band repeater might, or might not, be the "Deus ex machina" that  
solves all your team's problems - but don't count on it, because  
technology is the least important weapon in a ham's arsenal when the  
chips are down. I once owned a fancy and delicate radio that I hesitated  
to take out in the rain or loan to another ham: now, I have three basic  
HT's and I invest in myself and my capabilities instead. 
 
Having regular exercise, which is free, has better prepared me for an  
emergency than any amount of money could have. Knowing the capabilities,  
limitations, and advantages of RG-8 has made it possible to connect  
thirty-year-old ground planes cut for 46 MHz to two-meter radios and  
have them in service in minutes instead of hours. Participating in  
regular drills, although inconvenient, has been twice as valuable as any  
piece of hardware could have been when I was tired, hungry, irritated,  
wet, and constipated. 
 
The most important asset we can bring to any deployment, no matter what  
the situation or the location, is _adaptability_. Although having good  
technology is helpful, having good practice and common sense and a "can  
do" attitude will always get you through when technology lets you down. 
 
HTH. YMMV. 
 
73, Bill W1AC 
 
P.S. Whatever you do, don't forget extra batteries, duct tape, and  
toilet paper. You can use the bag the duct tape came in to wrap the  
toilet paper, and trust me on this - wet duct tape is a lot easier to  
use than wet toilet paper. ;-) 
 
(Remove "73" and change the top level domain for direct replies) 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |