Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Bonine wrote:
As the time of year approaches to begin thinking about hurricanes and disaster communications, I'm going to upgrade my 2-meter rig with one that is capable of crossband repeat. I would like for this same radio to double as my in-shack equipment during normal times. I'm looking for something with enough power to handle marginal conditions, rugged and able to handle high temperatures and long duty cycles, and reasonably easy to operate in the field. (I don't mind needing a computer and software to set up lots of memories, but I need to be able to program in an unknown repeater in the field when the computer isn't available.) Naturally the vendors assure me that all their new gear can do this, but somehow I'd rather hear it from people who have actually done it in the heat of battle. 73, Steve KB9X Steve, It's always a good idea to have a rig with good capabilities, and any of the commercial units that advertise cross-band repeat will fill that need. I feel compelled, however, to sound a note of caution: I've been involved with disaster preparedness for many years, and was even on the Boston Esplanade helping to manage the medical responses and lost children during the July 4, 1976 Pops concert that drew the largest crowd ever recorded in Boston's history. The long and short of it is that _WE_ are the most important asset in an emergency and that _WE_ are most in need of preparation. If we're going to represent ourselves as being ready to help during times of crisis, then the practical knowledge and preparedness we bring with us will outweigh any single radio. A cross-band repeater might, or might not, be the "Deus ex machina" that solves all your team's problems - but don't count on it, because technology is the least important weapon in a ham's arsenal when the chips are down. I once owned a fancy and delicate radio that I hesitated to take out in the rain or loan to another ham: now, I have three basic HT's and I invest in myself and my capabilities instead. Having regular exercise, which is free, has better prepared me for an emergency than any amount of money could have. Knowing the capabilities, limitations, and advantages of RG-8 has made it possible to connect thirty-year-old ground planes cut for 46 MHz to two-meter radios and have them in service in minutes instead of hours. Participating in regular drills, although inconvenient, has been twice as valuable as any piece of hardware could have been when I was tired, hungry, irritated, wet, and constipated. The most important asset we can bring to any deployment, no matter what the situation or the location, is _adaptability_. Although having good technology is helpful, having good practice and common sense and a "can do" attitude will always get you through when technology lets you down. HTH. YMMV. 73, Bill W1AC P.S. Whatever you do, don't forget extra batteries, duct tape, and toilet paper. You can use the bag the duct tape came in to wrap the toilet paper, and trust me on this - wet duct tape is a lot easier to use than wet toilet paper. ;-) (Remove "73" and change the top level domain for direct replies) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossband repeat | Moderated | |||
Kenwood TM-V7A crossband repeat and remote control? | Equipment | |||
ICOM IC-2710 Crossband | Equipment | |||
Kenwood TM-V7A crossband repeat and remote control? | Equipment | |||
Kenwood TM-V7A crossband repeat and remote control? | Equipment |