John Smith wrote in news:j0govt$te8$2@dont-
email.me:

On 7/23/2011 10:47 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
John wrote in
:



Well, I suppose we are ...

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-video-ch...-americans-as-
most
-likely-terrorists/

But then, anyone fed up and not willing to take more chit will join
us!

Are you trying to prove their point?


I don't think they are so stupid they don't realize some Americans can
read the Constitution, recognize what they have done, and realize the
obligations placed on us by the forefathers ... the second amendment
has
nothing to do with hunting or sport, and everything to do about using
force to reclaim public servant offices if usurped by criminals ...

Actually, no, it doesn't. The state militias could have been effectively
disarmed by the central government if it ignored Art I(8)(16). Therefore
the Second Amendment was passed to protect the right to keep and bear
arms of the populace (read people) so that the pool of armed citizenry
from which the state militias were drawn would remain in place with no
interference from the federal government.


--
RD (The Sandman)

Thought for the day.......

Handle every stressful situation like a dog would.
If you can't eat it or hump it....**** on it and walk away.