Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisa? w wiadomo?ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
All the links I quote are wrote by "people who have
spent decades building and using antennas in the real world, people
ranging
in education from knowledgable hobbyiests to degreed engineers and
scientists."
Are you one of them?
S*
Am I one of what?
If you mean what are MY qualifications to call you a babbling idiot, I
have
been building and using antennas for about 50 years and have a degree in
Electrical and Electronic Engineering.
How long have you been building and using antennas and what degrees do
you have?
Instead writting the "babbling idiot" write a long article on antennas
without ground.
Why as there already exists thousands and thousands of such literature
references?
Howver you are too much of an ignorant, ineducable, babbling idiot to be
able to read any of them and understand them.
You were totally unable to understand something as simple as:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antenna
and started babbling about the colors on the graphics showing you haven't
a clue what the article was actually saying.
You wrote: "Only end fed monopoles need radials". Do you mean that "Only end
fed monopoles need ground"?
No, I meant what I said.
You, however, are too much of an ignorant, ineducable, babbling idiot to be
able to understand it.
To be precise, only end fed monopoles need a counterpoise.
The counterpoise can consist of either radials, a large conductive area
fabricated for the purpose, or the Earth itself IF the surface conductivity
is high enough.
The words "ground", "radial", and "counterpoise" in relation to antennas
are three diffent things with three different meanings but you are too
much of an ignorant, ineducable, babbling idiot to be to understand that.
A quarter wave, end fed vertical monopole with a set of radials does NOT
need a connection to ground.
The radials serve as the counterpoise.
As you are an ignorant, ineducable, babbling idiot you will not understand
any of this and will reply with babbling nonsense.