May 10th 13, 02:05 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.usa
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 327
|
|
BENGHAZI AND WATERGATE
On 05/09/2013 03:42 PM, Jackie Chan wrote:
How different history might have been if the news media then were as
blasé about Watergate as they've been about Benghazi, if Republicans
then were as disinterested in truth as Democrats are now.
If Watergate had not brought Richard Nixon low, the "emerging
Republican majority" Kevin Phillips predicted in his 1969 book might
well have.
http://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Repub.../dp/0870000586
Democrats wouldn't have won the lopsided majorities in the 1974
congressional elections that led to the vast expansion of domestic
spending that now threatens to bankrupt the country. President Nixon,
if unweakened by scandal, wouldn't have abandoned South Vietnam when
the North Vietnamese invaded.
The Watergate burglars were caught while removing a bug on the phone
of a Democratic National Committee official they believed supplied
prostitutes for visiting Democrat big shots.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...e-in-break-in/
President Nixon and his senior aides were furious when they found out.
They were undone by their attempt to cover up a crime in which they
were not involved. A crime in which no one died, like those in
Benghazi.
www.ToThePointNews.com
Fog of war and all that. It's good to be da king. Get over it.
|