| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
May 10th 13, 02:05 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.usa
|
|||
|
|||
BENGHAZI AND WATERGATE
On 05/09/2013 03:42 PM, Jackie Chan wrote:
How different history might have been if the news media then were as blasé about Watergate as they've been about Benghazi, if Republicans then were as disinterested in truth as Democrats are now. If Watergate had not brought Richard Nixon low, the "emerging Republican majority" Kevin Phillips predicted in his 1969 book might well have. http://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Repub.../dp/0870000586 Democrats wouldn't have won the lopsided majorities in the 1974 congressional elections that led to the vast expansion of domestic spending that now threatens to bankrupt the country. President Nixon, if unweakened by scandal, wouldn't have abandoned South Vietnam when the North Vietnamese invaded. The Watergate burglars were caught while removing a bug on the phone of a Democratic National Committee official they believed supplied prostitutes for visiting Democrat big shots. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/...e-in-break-in/ President Nixon and his senior aides were furious when they found out. They were undone by their attempt to cover up a crime in which they were not involved. A crime in which no one died, like those in Benghazi. www.ToThePointNews.com Fog of war and all that. It's good to be da king. Get over it. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Who said Watergate? | CB | |||
| Bowling for Watergate Bunnies,,,I mean, "ducks" | CB | |||
Hybrid Mode
