View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old September 16th 04, 05:50 AM
Jer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you would 'google' it up, you would find that the military prempts the
FCC and can operate just about anywhere they want without 'permission' from
the FCC. I found some military stuff right in the middle of our 450 band a
couple years ago, and challenged the operator. He was only to glad to give
me a phone number to call, which I did, I ended up at a military base
talking to a high ranking officer who directed me to several web sites that
explained it all. He was right, they were legal, and I was supposed to 'bug
off' whenever I heard them even though my ham license said I could operate
there. The FCC couldn't do a thing about it...

Jer

"gudmundur" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

From the ARRL's saturday morning missive:

=="INTRUDER SIGNAL" ON 40 METERS REMAINS A MYSTERY FOR NOW

An unidentified signal that's been showing up on the 40-meter phone band
on or about 7238 kHz has mystified amateurs in the western US and Canada,
where it's been heard frequently for the past few weeks. Although it
resembles a steady carrier, a closer inspection suggests that the
intruding signal actually is a series of closely spaced signals. Don
Moman, VE6JY, in Edmonton, Alberta, says the signal is quite loud at his
QTH.

"This signal looks a lot more interesting than it would sound--just a
broad tone/hum/buzz, depending on where you tune," he said. One
spectrogram from VE6JY showed perhaps a half-dozen or more discrete
signals. "It's certainly loud enough out here, peaking broadly
south-southwest from Edmonton," he said. Moman was using a 5-element Yagi
and was hearing the signal at 10 dB over S9.

That conforms with observations reported by Bob Gonsett, W6VR, at
Communications General Corp (CGC). He says engineers at the CGC lab in
Fallbrook, California took a quick look at the intruder September 6 at
around 2120 UTC and found "several close-spaced CW carriers--perhaps from
one specially modulated transmitter, perhaps from transmitters at
different locations," he reported. CGC reported the signals appeared on
7238.063, 7238.150, 7238.237 and 7238.412 kHz, with the 7238.237 kHz
signal being "the strongest of the group."

While no one's sure what it is, the FCC HF Direction Finding Facility has
been able to determine that it's coming from somewhere north of Prescott,
Arizona, and west of Interstate 17. FCC monitoring indicates the "buzz" is
centered on 7238.1 kHz with a bandwidth of about 1 kHz and spikes spaced
at about 90 Hz apart.

Reports to the International Amateur Radio Union Region 2 Monitoring
System indicate the signal has been heard from about 1700 to 2130 UTC,
although Moman reported hearing it at around 0300 UTC and said the signal
even went off the air for a few seconds while he was listening to it. Jack
Roland, KE0VH, in Colorado also heard the signals for a couple of evenings
this week. "Something is not right there," he remarked.

High Noon Net Manager Bill Savage, N5FLD, in Albuquerque, New Mexico said
several net participants--in Nebraska, Colorado, Nebraska, Wyoming,
Minnesota and Arizona--were able to hear the mystery signal.

So, like the Russian Woodpecker, just swamp it with about 10 hams
running full legal limit, and keying quickly, and randomly. Maybe
you can chase it away. Or maybe find it's source, and destroy it,
and it's owners. It continues to **** me off that 'official' agencies
think nothing of plopping signals right in the middle of amatuer
bands, and ****ting on us, even thought there are rules that forbid
such uses of our frequencies. Gee, wasn't it possible for the signal's
owner to put it over 7.300 mhz. Screw them with a capital F.
I used to love to drive the woodpecker crazy. It was easy to chase it
out of the ham bands. Maybe we can make the 'mystery' signal
useless to it's owners. Now why is it that 'they' could find us
quicker than 'they' can find the mistery signal and eliminate it???
Hahaha, wish I still had access to some 500kw Navy shorebased
rhombic stuff. Although the rhombics probably would not be facing
the correct direction. At one time I may have been able to swamp
their receiver into oblivian.

Just the ramblings of another ****ed off ham who hates folks using
hambands 'without our prior consent'.