Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jer wrote: If you would 'google' it up, you would find that the military prempts the FCC and can operate just about anywhere they want without 'permission' from the FCC. I found some military stuff right in the middle of our 450 band a couple years ago, and challenged the operator. He was only to glad to give me a phone number to call, which I did, I ended up at a military base talking to a high ranking officer who directed me to several web sites that explained it all. He was right, they were legal, and I was supposed to 'bug off' whenever I heard them even though my ham license said I could operate there. The FCC couldn't do a thing about it... For the 420-450 band in particular (and many of the other UHF bands as well), the FCC's allocation of these bands to the amateur radio service is "secondary", with government users being the "primary". Amateurs "must not interfere" with the government users and "must tolerate" interference from government users. There are certain other services which have been granted "primary" use of these bands in certain parts of the country, as well, and amateurs must not interfere with these. FWIW, I didn't see any indication in the ARRL article which suggested that the 7238 kHz carrier cluster is from a government operation, and as the signal doesn't appear to be actually carrying significant intelligence in its carrier or sidebands it may just be some odd piece of equipment which has started oscillating strangely. I'll be really interested to learn what it eventually turns out to be. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
.... I found some military stuff right in the middle of our 450 band a
couple years ago, and challenged the operator. He was only to glad to give me a phone number to call, which I did, I ended up at a military base talking to a high ranking officer .... My experience locally was on two meters, but the high-ranking officer said that if/when it happened again, I should call him and ask to have their frequency(ies) changed to something that didn't interfere with whatever we were using. --Myron. -- Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and cartridge PhD EE (retired). "Barbershop" tenor. CDL(PTXS). W0PBV. (785) 539-4448 NRA Life Member and Certified Instructor (Home Firearm Safety, Rifle, Pistol) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jer" ) writes: If you would 'google' it up, you would find that the military prempts the FCC and can operate just about anywhere they want without 'permission' from the FCC. I found some military stuff right in the middle of our 450 band a couple years ago, and challenged the operator. In general, the military everywhere like to rely on Article 38 of the ITU Conventions. The first para of Article 38 pretty much says the military radio installations of any country can do whatever they want. But the second para says "Nevertheless these installations must so far as possible observe statutory provisions relative to ... the measures to be taken to prevent harmful interference [to other services] ..." Many military people are like other people I know (present company excepted of course HI) - as soon as they find something they like, they stop reading, so they never get to the second paragraph of Article 38. It may be worth reminding them occasionally that ITU Article 38 is not a blank cheque. .... Martin VE3OAT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hallicrafters S77A shortwave receiver SSB detection | Boatanchors | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew | |||
signal to noise ratio drops on connecting the antenna | Homebrew |