What is the point of digital voice?
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			rickman  wrote: 
 On 2/25/2015 11:54 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: 
 "gareth"  wrote: 
 "rickman"  wrote in message 
 ... 
  
 Maybe I don't understand the issue.  Isn't that a valid example of a 
 negative frequency?  There are some DSP experts in comp.dsp who talk about 
 negative frequency often. 
  
 If you, or, indeed, anyone else has any difficulties with the subject matter 
 and DSP in general, then do ask me, because having worked through 
 what appeared as a number of anomalies (all resolved 9 years ago 
 when I was working as a DSP manufacturer, picoChip in Bath, UK) 
 I feel sure that I'm well positioned to understand the difficulties that 
 others might encounter in this area. 
  
 WARNING! Make sure to search the archives and read all about his "Big K" 
 theory before taking seriously anything Gareth says about DSP. It'll 
 quickly become apparent that he has no understanding whatsoever of the 
 subject and you'll save yourself from wasting any time talking to him about 
 it. 
  
 Interestingly, the true experts of comp.dsp refer to Gareth Alun Evans 
 G4SDW as "that idiot from uk.radio.amateur". 
  
 LOL!  I see this is cross posted to comp.dsp.  I don't feel like 
 researching the "Big K" theory, but I would be interested in hearing a 
 bit if anyone cares to share the humor. 
 
It all sprang from Gareth being corrected over one of his routine total 
misunderstandings and he went off the deep end about it, as per, and cooked 
up "Big K", a Time Cube like confabulation and misrepresentation of known 
physics. Some time later, after receiving much mocking, he declared that 
he'd found some obscure textbook (AIUI, nobody has been able to verify the 
contents of this supposed textbook, or even its existence) that proved that 
he was correct and that every other person on the planet was wrong and 
always had been. Thereafter, he refused to be drawn further on "Big K", 
saying that he had settled the matter "to [his] satisfaction". 
 
There's little to be gained from reading Gareth's "Big K" theory, as it's 
arm-waving nonsense of the highest order. I did challenge him last year to 
produce a fully referenced paper on the subject that I could review and 
assess, but he point-blank refused, of course.  
 
--  
STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |