Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rickman wrote:
On 2/25/2015 11:54 AM, Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: "gareth" wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... Maybe I don't understand the issue. Isn't that a valid example of a negative frequency? There are some DSP experts in comp.dsp who talk about negative frequency often. If you, or, indeed, anyone else has any difficulties with the subject matter and DSP in general, then do ask me, because having worked through what appeared as a number of anomalies (all resolved 9 years ago when I was working as a DSP manufacturer, picoChip in Bath, UK) I feel sure that I'm well positioned to understand the difficulties that others might encounter in this area. WARNING! Make sure to search the archives and read all about his "Big K" theory before taking seriously anything Gareth says about DSP. It'll quickly become apparent that he has no understanding whatsoever of the subject and you'll save yourself from wasting any time talking to him about it. Interestingly, the true experts of comp.dsp refer to Gareth Alun Evans G4SDW as "that idiot from uk.radio.amateur". LOL! I see this is cross posted to comp.dsp. I don't feel like researching the "Big K" theory, but I would be interested in hearing a bit if anyone cares to share the humor. It all sprang from Gareth being corrected over one of his routine total misunderstandings and he went off the deep end about it, as per, and cooked up "Big K", a Time Cube like confabulation and misrepresentation of known physics. Some time later, after receiving much mocking, he declared that he'd found some obscure textbook (AIUI, nobody has been able to verify the contents of this supposed textbook, or even its existence) that proved that he was correct and that every other person on the planet was wrong and always had been. Thereafter, he refused to be drawn further on "Big K", saying that he had settled the matter "to [his] satisfaction". There's little to be gained from reading Gareth's "Big K" theory, as it's arm-waving nonsense of the highest order. I did challenge him last year to produce a fully referenced paper on the subject that I could review and assess, but he point-blank refused, of course. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|