"Dwight Stewart"  wrote in message 
... 
 "Brian Kelly" wrote: 
 
  (snip)   Can you cite a single example of a nocode who 
  "pushed the hobby/service forward" since then?  (snip) 
 
 
   In what way are we supposed to push the hobby/service forward? Give us 
an 
 example - an example of something a person with code ability has done in 
the 
 last two to three decades to push the hobby/service forward. 
 
   As I see it, the Technicians are doing pretty much doing the same things 
 the other license holders are doing - talking on the radio, tinkering with 
 their equipment, occasionally going to club meetings, occasionally helping 
 out in disasters, and so on. All of these are contributions. Obviously, 
 nothing special since other license holders are also doing the same 
things, 
 but I wasn't aware Technicians were expected to do more than the other 
 license holders. 
 
 
  And while you're at it perhaps you can explain what 
  would change in this respect by handing nocodes access 
  to the HF bands too? 
 
 
   You, Brian, aren't handing access to the HF bands to those without code 
 ability. Regardless, since you're opposed to HF access for those without 
 code ability, and that position is out of step with the current trend, it 
is 
 up to you to make an argument to support that position. Demanding more 
from 
 those without code ability than those with is not exactly a strong 
argument. 
 
 
One of the big no-code arguments is that code was keeping highly qualified 
people out of ham ram radio and that these people would push the hobby 
forward technically.  So the other side asked what have the current 
no-coders done to push it forward to prove that dropping the code altogether 
would bring in the hi-tech types since we ought to have a bunch of hi-tech 
types in the no-code tech group.  If one looks at reality, only a very, very 
limited handful of people came up with the technical advances regardless of 
license class so it's probably not a fair question anyway. Plus it would be 
skewed by the fact that prior to the no-code tech license, all hams had to 
have code.   Neither side has a good argument attempting to use this point 
to prove anything. 
 
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE 
 
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |