Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message ... "Brian Kelly" wrote: (snip) Can you cite a single example of a nocode who "pushed the hobby/service forward" since then? (snip) In what way are we supposed to push the hobby/service forward? Give us an example - an example of something a person with code ability has done in the last two to three decades to push the hobby/service forward. As I see it, the Technicians are doing pretty much doing the same things the other license holders are doing - talking on the radio, tinkering with their equipment, occasionally going to club meetings, occasionally helping out in disasters, and so on. All of these are contributions. Obviously, nothing special since other license holders are also doing the same things, but I wasn't aware Technicians were expected to do more than the other license holders. And while you're at it perhaps you can explain what would change in this respect by handing nocodes access to the HF bands too? You, Brian, aren't handing access to the HF bands to those without code ability. Regardless, since you're opposed to HF access for those without code ability, and that position is out of step with the current trend, it is up to you to make an argument to support that position. Demanding more from those without code ability than those with is not exactly a strong argument. One of the big no-code arguments is that code was keeping highly qualified people out of ham ram radio and that these people would push the hobby forward technically. So the other side asked what have the current no-coders done to push it forward to prove that dropping the code altogether would bring in the hi-tech types since we ought to have a bunch of hi-tech types in the no-code tech group. If one looks at reality, only a very, very limited handful of people came up with the technical advances regardless of license class so it's probably not a fair question anyway. Plus it would be skewed by the fact that prior to the no-code tech license, all hams had to have code. Neither side has a good argument attempting to use this point to prove anything. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Noise and Loops Question | Antenna | |||
Stacking Distance Question. More Information | Antenna | |||
Stupid question G5RV | Antenna | |||
QEI INC. QUINDAR RADIO UNIT TELEMETRY QUESTION got from hamfest | General | |||
Question about attenuators ... | Antenna |