View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old August 4th 03, 05:21 PM
Robert Casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rob Kemp wrote:

Quote from the American Public Power Association; "the burden should
be imposed on challengers to BPL to demonstrate interference in a
fact-based, empirical proof. Further, to the extent that interference
is demonstrated, there should be an attempt to accommodate BPL, even
if it means that existing communications providers may have to share
or transfer bandwidth."
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs...t=6514287 496


BPL is not a system that needs to radiate RF signals to do its job, it
would be an
unintentional radiator. It's a system going point to point via wires,
not a system
that uses isolated boxes (radios) that communicate via RF "over the
air". Thus there
is no reason why we would need to share spectrum with BPL.

Critical everyone submits a reply comment ASAP.

To file, go here;
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi
"Proceeding" field, enter "03-104"
"Document Type" select "Reply to comments"