View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old September 24th 03, 02:09 AM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
I think Clint has already said he only sees a need for regs and safety

testing.


There's "the future".

73 de Jim, N2EY


Given the detail and extent of the rules, we could right a killer test on
rules and regs.


Not really. All questions and answers are filtered through the QPC and again
through the FCC. "Killer" Q&A can be rejected.

Then require people to take and pass that before taking any
of the elements for specific licenses. i.e. They have to know the rules in
detail before being tested on the theory, technical knowledge, and operating
practices for the licenses classes.


Better yet - split the test into different subelements and require a passing
grade in each. No getting all the regs questions wrong and all the theory
questions right (or vice versa) and still passing.

I suggested that in my comments to 98-143. FCC went the other way. Tells ya
somethin'.

73 de Jim, N2EY