Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: "N2EY" wrote in message ... I think Clint has already said he only sees a need for regs and safety testing. There's "the future". 73 de Jim, N2EY Given the detail and extent of the rules, we could right a killer test on rules and regs. Not really. All questions and answers are filtered through the QPC and again through the FCC. "Killer" Q&A can be rejected. Then require people to take and pass that before taking any of the elements for specific licenses. i.e. They have to know the rules in detail before being tested on the theory, technical knowledge, and operating practices for the licenses classes. Better yet - split the test into different subelements and require a passing grade in each. No getting all the regs questions wrong and all the theory questions right (or vice versa) and still passing. I suggested that in my comments to 98-143. FCC went the other way. Tells ya somethin'. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|