View Single Post
  #119   Report Post  
Old September 24th 03, 10:42 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes:

Regardless of one's stance on the code, reviewing the history of the FCC
shows that they are NOT necessarily concerned with what's best for the ARS.


That's not required under the FCC's charter from the US Congress.

"What is best for the ARS" is an extremely subjective (and thus
prejudicial) viewpoint.




If they were, BPL would never have gotten as far as it has.