LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21   Report Post  
Old August 11th 06, 12:09 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 162
Default Engineers - Photo 16b.jpg (0/1)

What about the Lowfers in the 135 KHz range? I've hear rumors of hams
using those LF frequencies...

Scott



Reg Edwards wrote:

"Frank's" wrote
What is interesting, in my preliminary results, is that there is
only a 2% improvement in sky wave total radiated power with
120 radials over 36


=====================================
Frank,

If what you are saying is that efficiency is the same for both 36 and
120 radials, then, at least at 8 MHz, B,L&E's findings for LF do not
apply at HF.

Amateurs do not use LF. They use HF.
----
Reg.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"The Radio Handbook" Editors and Engineers 9th Edition, 1942 David Stinson Boatanchors 1 January 9th 05 05:48 PM
FS: Palomar Engineers PT-340 Tuner-Tuner Bob Parnass, AJ9S Swap 0 February 20th 04 02:10 AM
FS: Palomar Engineers MDB-2 Magnetic Balun Victor Trucco Shortwave 1 January 26th 04 01:38 AM
For the electrical engineers Tdonaly Homebrew 0 September 26th 03 12:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017