Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 14th 06, 12:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Frequency Sensitivity of mobile HF vertical antennas.

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote:
Or, do you claim the net Z01B + 0.646[Case 1} is now electrically
longer, in degrees, than Z01A + 0.646[case 2]. Why?


I already explained how to prove to yourself why those
two cases are different. Please perform the Smith Chart
gymnastics and then report your findings.


If one takes one foot of stinger and transfers it to the
base element section, the antenna length remains the same
and the resonant frequency increases. I assume you already
knew that. So of course, 0.646 is electrically longer when
it is on top of the coil than when it is on the bottom of
the coil. The Smith Chart exercise will show why that is
true.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Electromagnetic Radiation N9OGL General 31 March 1st 06 02:42 PM
Electromagnetic Radiation N9OGL Policy 32 March 1st 06 02:42 PM
FS: Dual-band Mobile Antennas [email protected] Swap 0 January 30th 06 10:09 PM
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
Mobile Antennas Jerry Antenna 0 September 8th 03 07:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017