| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy, I use a couple of methods. First, the RP card as follows:
RP 0 19 73 1002 -90 0 5.0 5.0 Where, the last digit of "XNDA" is "2", and the average gain is calculated providing the following output: AVERAGE POWER GAIN= 3.00224E-01 SOLID ANGLE USED IN AVERAGING=( 2.0000)*PI STERADIANS. POWER RADIATED ASSUMING RADIATION INTO 4*PI STERADIANS = 1.15944E+01 WATTS The input power for this particular test was 38.619 W. As a verification I numerically integrate (Excel) the total radiated E-field over a hemispherical region. The elemental area I use is r^2*sine(theta)*d(theta)*d(phi). Of course the E field is normalized to 1 m, and "r" is obviously "1". d(phi), and d(theta) are both one degree. The results are in very close agreement with the radiation, as above, in 4*PI Steradians/2. I therefore have a fairly accurate figure for the total radiated power without the surface wave. For the next step I use the following RP card: RP 1 101 1 0000 200 0 -2 1 200. The problem is, of course, that the results are only available in cylindrical coordinates. Where the total ground wave, and sky wave, is computed in the far field (Where I have taken the far field to be 200 meters at 8 MHz) from Z = 200 to Z = 0, in steps of 2 meters (From theta(zenith) 45 to 90). I then normalize these data to a radial distance of 1 m; taking only those data points close to (theta) integral degrees. Picking out these data points, taken from the NEC output file, in Excel is a fairly tedious process. I then "cut and paste" these normalized data into my "integrating" Excel spread sheet; replacing the previously computed "sky wave" data from 45 to 90 degrees. These results then give me the total radiated power, including the surface wave. I can then easily compute the contribution, to the total radiated power, by the surface wave. When I replace the data, in the integrating spread sheet, the data at 44 degrees is very close to the 45 degree field strength, obtained from the cylindrical coordinates. Hope you managed to follow my rambling description. To say the least it requires a lot of tedious data manipulation with Excel. If you are interested I can e-mail my spread sheets, NEC input and output files, etc. Regards, Frank (VE6CB) "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... I'm curious: How did you calculate the total radiated power including surface wave, and how did you determine what fraction of the radiated power is in the surface wave? Roy Lewallen, W7EL Frank's wrote: . . . Note that the radiation resistance is computed from the total radiated power (including surface wave) divided by the RMS base current squared. . . . |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
| Folded monopole dilemma | Antenna | |||
| Virtual ground monopole HF Antenna | Antenna | |||
| Virtual ground monopole HF Antenna | Equipment | |||
| Virtual ground monopole HF Antenna | Equipment | |||