"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
"Art Unwin KB9MZ" wrote
Very, very good Reg.

==========================

Art, nice to hear from a representative of the few who agree with what is
the bleeding obvious.

I am aware of your long outstanding problems about convincing folks of the
properties of your loop-coupled antenna proposals.

But I am too exhausted and too long-in-the-tooth to take part in the (by
far) unecessarily convoluted arguments.

Try KISS. Provide a precise, unambiguous picture of all dimensions and
submit it to a program capable of analysing it - if you can find one.

Reg, no need for help as it is all completed with success.
I may add. I used AO PRO to do the final wrap up as well as making the
antennas which in uncompromising fashion proved what you are stating but
what other people have been unable to understand .
And I have made many different antennas of this family.!
I might add that with shorting either capacitor one can change a "T match
style antenna "to other forms that provide for high or low impedance at the
antenna feed point. to meet requirements of the transmitter.as well as
providing a ' loss less' interface, a subject that has been bandied around
for years but in isolation.
I am sure glad however, to see a dissertation such as yours that was
unsolicitated even tho it may finish up as a 'Plonk" on this side of the
Pond as many times the obvious is ignored until it apears in a book
Hopefully you will able to withstand the junk that will now be thrown at
you for stating such an outrageous thing.
Cheers
Art


I am
unable to provide any assistance myself in that direction.

May you and yours enjoy life in 2004 to the full.
----
Yours, Reg, G4FGQ.

Art:

[snip]
Reg, no need for help as it is all completed with success.
I may add. I used AO PRO to do the final wrap up as well as making the
antennas which in uncompromising fashion proved what you are stating but
what other people have been unable to understand .
[snip]

Art, you can't blame others for not understanding! What?

It is your responsibility and your's alone to help others to understand
your ideas, concepts, inventions.

Any failure of others to understand is your responsibility alone!

There are three important things in science:

Communications, communications and communications. Clearly *you* have
failed to communicate.

If you communicate clearly and succinctly without whining and do so clearly
and unequivocally and stop complaining that no one understands you, why...
then you may succeed! I for one certainly wish you well in that regard.

[snip]
I am sure glad however, to see a dissertation such as yours that was
unsolicitated even tho it may finish up as a 'Plonk" on this side of the
Pond as many times the obvious is ignored until it apears in a book
[snip]

Not true at all. Reg is quite capable of explaining himself and no one
that I know of feels that Reg's contributions to the NG are "plonk".
Apparently you might!

[snip]
Hopefully you will able to withstand the junk that will now be thrown at
you for stating such an outrageous thing.
Cheers
Art
[snip]

Reg has proven that he can withstand criticism, questioning, and
examination,
he has demonstrated that many times over on this NG... he needs no help or
appeals to the lack of ability of readers and listeners. Art, wake up and
smell
the roses and practice: Communicatons, communications, communications...

:-)

You are doing better, but... you have come very close to whining again
here...

If no one understands you, it is your fault!

"Perception is Reality" -Tom Peters

Best regards for the New Year,

--
Peter K1PO
Indialantic By-the-Sea, FL.