On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:19:01 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
Thanks, Cecil. That's a good excuse to just go ahead and shorten my
balun connections.

But Bob, how do you know those impedance transformations are
not beneficial to your matching process? :-)

Dammit, Cecil, I don't know :-(

So, I'll keep what I have in place (it actually works fine), but build
an alternative balun. See what happens.

Bob
k5qwg

Any attempt to improve on a working antenna situation has generally made it
worse.



"Bob Miller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:19:01 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Bob Miller wrote:
Thanks, Cecil. That's a good excuse to just go ahead and shorten my
balun connections.

But Bob, how do you know those impedance transformations are
not beneficial to your matching process? :-)

Dammit, Cecil, I don't know :-(

So, I'll keep what I have in place (it actually works fine), but build
an alternative balun. See what happens.

Bob
k5qwg