Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:27:10 GMT, "Lee" wrote: Yes, thanks for the info but i would like a little more gain than a standard discone gives...going to a parabolic discone would be the alternate option but a little too involved.... Parabolic discone??!!!?? Involved is not the word. Hi Lee, Everyone wants more gain. You don't say why and that may negate wanting gain. At the frequency you are desiring, performance is very much limited to line of sight and even 2M handhelds with rubber duckies can work the Space Shuttle an hundred miles up. Consider the downside of gain: you are a tourist at the Grand Canyon and you put a telephoto lens on your camera (high gain). When you get home and show your pictures to friends, they might ask why you went to the Grand Canyon but took pictures only of the river bed at the bottom, or a cactus on the ridge. Too much gain for the intended use which was to show the ENTIRE canyon in one shot. This would take a wide-angle lens (very low gain). I have a wide angle lens (low gain) it`s known as a discone !!! freq range to 3000megs, supposedly 0db ref dipole that has heard one or two weak signals just outside its range....now i need a telephoto lens to make out what it is.......a wideband antenna with gain -- a log periodic!!!! With respect Richard, i have a scanning radio receiver that scans up to 2500megs - that`s a lot of coverage which requires more gain the higher you go....a discone just doesn`t cut it gainwise so i need a wideband antenna with more directional gain to work alongside the discone...a yagi with one meg bandwidth isn`t much use either...imagine how many i would have lying around!!! besides, i know how to design those....... :-) Anyway, simple scaling works. Just research the model of antenna that gives you the gain characteristics you want, and scale to your band of interest. The downside here is you may find that you have designed yourself into a corner because you cannot find the right stock that supports the dimensions. For a log periodic, this might not matter so much, and especially for a receiver, but latitude is not generous. If i knew how to scale or re-engineer an existing design, i wouldn`t be on this NG asking how to do it ... Thanks for the advice Richard ...... 73... Lee......G6ZSG...... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Log Periodic question | Antenna | |||
WANTED: comments on the Elk Antenna 2m/70cm log periodic | Antenna | |||
HF Log Periodic WTB | Antenna | |||
WTB; 10M thru 20M log periodic | Antenna | |||
ATN Log periodic | Equipment |