| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 04:45:57 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Jim - NN7K wrote: ... but it is beyond the ability to have MORE power returned to the source, than the source provided Did you know a reflection coefficient can be greater than 1.0? It is true that reflection coefficient can be greater than 1.0. The reflection coefficient *CANNOT* be greater than 1.0 where Zo is purely resistive. So, where a sampler is calibrated (nulled) on a purely resistive load (eg 50+j0) as is most commonly done, it should never show a reflection coefficient greater than 1. A reflectometer calibrated to a resistive load and that shows a "reflected" reading greater than the "set" reading is inaccurate / defective / a poor design. Owen -- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|