Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only if the buggy whip conveys useful information to the "horseless carrage"
as it did in the case of the horse. As CW still conveys information as it did in the beginnings of radio the anology does not hold water... "Cecil Moore" wrote in message om... funkbastler wrote: ... I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". I'm sure that drivers licenses applicants can learn to use buggy whips on their horseless carriages, but should they be required to? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred Hambrecht wrote:
Only if the buggy whip conveys useful information to the "horseless carrage" as it did in the case of the horse. We could probably modify vehicles to respond to lashes from a buggy whip and eliminate the accelerator. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So are you saying that CW no longer works? Not to be judgmental, but your an
idiot. wrote in message ... On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:35:14 -0400, "Fred Hambrecht" wrote: in the begining it conveyed data other radio radio services as well as the ars today it does not http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 21:12:44 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote:
funkbastler wrote: ... I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". I'm sure that drivers licenses applicants can learn to use buggy whips on their horseless carriages, but should they be required to? No, but it darned sure wouldn't hurt to make sure they could drive something with a standard transmission. Never know when the ol' grind-o-crunch automatic is gonna give out and ya has to use something more reliable. -- -fb- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
funkbastler wrote:
No, but it darned sure wouldn't hurt to make sure they could drive something with a standard transmission. Would you have 1000 people learn to drive a standard transmission even though only one person out of those 1000 people benefits from it? The cost/benefit ratio is extremely high. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: funkbastler wrote: ... I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". I'm sure that drivers licenses applicants can learn to use buggy whips on their horseless carriages, but should they be required to? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Try as I might, my V6 won't respond to the buggy whip. Kind of like my Novice experience on 40M CW. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote in
om: funkbastler wrote: ... I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". I'm sure that drivers licenses applicants can learn to use buggy whips on their horseless carriages, but should they be required to? They should if they want to be good back seat drivers. SC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
funkbastler wrote in
news ![]() On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag" wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or a little bit of effort. The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters. There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof. SC |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:19:21 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof. Well, I don't know KB9RQZ - but I'll say thay he's entitled to have and express his opinions, same as you and I, whether you or I agree with him or not. Y'all try to stay away from the ad hominem stuff now - it never convinces anybody of anything. Just ****es 'em off. -- -fb- |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() funkbastler wrote: On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 22:19:21 GMT, Slow Code wrote: There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof. Well, I don't know KB9RQZ - but I'll say thay he's entitled to have and express his opinions, same as you and I, whether you or I agree with him or not. Y'all try to stay away from the ad hominem stuff now - it never convinces anybody of anything. Just ****es 'em off. There's nothing "ad hominem" about comments directed towards Morkie the Moron, KB9RQZ. His CV of idiocity is volumous. Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |