Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:59:52 -0600, "John Smith" wrote: In the ARRL Handbook (and probably other ARRL publications), there is shown a multiple-band dipole. It consists of half-wave elements all attached to the same feed line but the dipole for each band is slightly separated from the others. It is essentially multiple dipoles in parallel. So, couldn't this work, as you say, just turned vertically? John KD5YI Hi John, Kinda like a blown out, stripped umbrella? Sure. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Page 20.6 of the 2002 ARRL Handbook, figure 20.12 shows one. They don't say to spread them out like that, but they talk about pruning due to interaction and not to have both 80 and 30 meters because of the odd harmonic relationship. That sort of thing. I don't know. I'm not one of the smart ones here, I just find stuff in the books. Anyway, *they* say it works and they don't say it has to be horizontal. I think ARRL has the attitude of "Try it--you'll probably like it." John KD5YI |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Advice good 80 meter vertical | Antenna | |||
Conix 160 Meter Vertical --CQ | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |