| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some would have you believe that radiation which is not within the main
lobe is miniscual so I suggest you imagine two models one of which has all lobes removed except the main lobe Do you feel that both models now need to be labelled to avoid confusion as they look so much alike?. How do you suggest that the power that is not in the main lobe is removed? You either have to somehow concentrate it into the main lobe or dissipate as heat in a load. If you concentrate it into the main lobe then the gain of the main lobe will go up, if you dissipate it as heat then the gain will remain the same. If either were possible they would not look like the original yagi. You seem to miss the point that the gain in the main lobe is effectively the power in the area illuminated by the main lobe divided by the power in all other directions. Reduce the power in the sidelobes then the gain must go up, (unless it is dissipated as heat, which is not possible in a yagi). 73 Jeff |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
| SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
| GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
| Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
| Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna | |||