| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil, efficiency depends on what your objectives are
The yagi antennas objective is to obtain a radiation beam of gain compared to radiation else where. What is wanted is a radiation lobe that one can use to direct communication. ..rThe yagi achieves the object of producing a lobe which has a higher gain than other lobes that the yagi produces.( A higher ratio) The yagi achieves its object by producing this main lobe but at what cost? If we look at pattern volume as reflecting as energy applied to the yagi we must compare that volume with the whole pattern volume. This means comparing the volume of the upper lobes, the side lobes, the rear lobe and of course the vertical lobe to the main lobe. Any cursury look at a three D radiation pattern will immediately see that the main lobe is less than 50 % of the total radiation pattern Let us look at a common dipole with a reflector, the planar view of radiation which ignores radiation outside the plane is a figure 8 where the addition of a reflector does nothing to enhance increased forward radiation so immidiately we can say that the forward lobe achieves what is termed a major lobe plus other forward lobes outside of the main lobe where as the radiation to the rear achieves nothing that enhances the forward main lobe. So just comparing the forward and the rear lobe we have only achieved 50 per cent of our object and this is not counting other losses. Now you may disagree with the objective of a yagi beam and I understand that may be the case. Hopefully the above answers your request to define efficiency as I was with respect to the yagi antenna. I think the above pretty much explains what I stated in the initial post tho it appears that some read inbetween the lines to read what they wanted to read as a diversionary tactic and there is not much anybody can do about that. One really has to ask themselves the question that if an antenna came on the market with only one main lobe would they buy it Art. Cecil Moore wrote: art wrote: When one looks at a.radiating array pattern one can see that the yagi is very inefficient. Please define "efficiency". -- 73, Cecil, http://www.w5dxp.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
art wrote:
. . . Any cursury look at a three D radiation pattern will immediately see that the main lobe is less than 50 % of the total radiation pattern . . . Out of curiosity, did you a) not read b) not understand, or c) not believe what I posted about the fraction of power in a Yagi's minor lobes? A cursory look at a 3D pattern is probably one of the least reliable ways to determine anything quantitative about an antenna pattern. By choosing the scale (e.g., field strength, power density, linear dB, ARRL-scale dB), you can make the relative sizes of the lobes just about anything you'd like and lead the casual observer to the conclusion of your choice(*). But why bother trying to divine a value from a 3D pattern, when it's so simple to numerically show that the power in the lobes is insignificant? (*) One of the slides in the "Antenna Basics" talk I've given at many hamfests shows several very different directional patterns, and I ask the audience which one is the most desirable. After the votes are in, I reveal that they're all the same antenna, just drawn to different common and legitimate scales. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Lewallen wrote: art wrote: . . . Any cursury look at a three D radiation pattern will immediately see that the main lobe is less than 50 % of the total radiation pattern . . . Out of curiosity, did you a) not read b) not understand, or snip I did not understand your logic. Front to back means nothing in terms of energy containment The measerment is a ratio not a quantity It also is a ratio only for a given plane and does not account for anything outside that plane. Have I stated anything wrong there? Point out the error of my ways starting with a simple dipole. Does any additional element to the array revert the radiation from the rear direction so that it is additive to the forward directive radiation of the main lobe? If so what percentage of the rearward radiation in the rear hemisphere,,(ot a planar amount) ? The question is to you Roy to answer for a one on one,It would help if you gave an actual percentage instead of a "major fraction" which you stated before And if you don't understand then just drop the thread as it has gone on way to long with relatively little specifics with respect to the original post Art c) not believe what I posted about the fraction of power in a Yagi's minor lobes? A cursory look at a 3D pattern is probably one of the least reliable ways to determine anything quantitative about an antenna pattern. By choosing the scale (e.g., field strength, power density, linear dB, ARRL-scale dB), you can make the relative sizes of the lobes just about anything you'd like and lead the casual observer to the conclusion of your choice(*). But why bother trying to divine a value from a 3D pattern, when it's so simple to numerically show that the power in the lobes is insignificant? I do not remember seeing any numerical answer ,was it specific and relative to the contained energy in the primary lobe because that is what I was looking for ? What was the actual percentage that you arrived at? (*) One of the slides in the "Antenna Basics" talk I've given at many Roy the actual scale doesn't matter one iota on a given pattern with respect to my question ! To compare different patterns one must have a common denominator such as scale, to do otherwise is an attempt to deceive. You also use the word "desirable"and my connoctation of that is a major lobe and nothing else whereas some may look for other characteristics. Did the group come to a consensus as to what was desirable? Some may want to hear what is said behind their backs! erns, and I ask the audience which one is the most desirable. After the votes are in, I reveal that they're all the same antenna, just drawn to different common and legitimate scales. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
art wrote:
I did not understand your logic. Front to back means nothing in terms of energy containment The measerment is a ratio not a quantity It also is a ratio only for a given plane and does not account for anything outside that plane. Have I stated anything wrong there? I thought your interest was in the amount of power contained in lobes other than the main lobe of a Yagi. My posting showed a simple way to relate front to back ratio, which is commonly known for many Yagis, to the fraction of power in secondary lobes, which is not. Point out the error of my ways starting with a simple dipole. Does any additional element to the array revert the radiation from the rear direction so that it is additive to the forward directive radiation of the main lobe? Of course. If so what percentage of the rearward radiation in the rear hemisphere,,(ot a planar amount) ? The question is to you Roy to answer for a one on one,It would help if you gave an actual percentage instead of a "major fraction" which you stated before In my earlier posting I apparently overestimated your ability to do what I thought was a simple calculation. So I'll do it for you so you can have a number. Since there's no "typical" Yagi, I presented one which most people would consider to be worse than average -- one having only a 6 dB front/back ratio. I also assumed for a starting point that the shape of the rear lobe (that is, beamwidth and height) is the same as the front lobe. The first calculation is to determine just what the ratio is of the powers in the front and rear lobe. The answer is 4:1. That is, the front lobe contains four times the power of the rear lobe. Since you seem to be interested in energy rather than power, simply consider the amount of energy each radiates in some amount of time: each second or other unit of time, the forward lobe radiates four times the energy of the rear lobe. What this says is that if you manage to get all the reverse-lobe power (or energy, if you prefer) into the front lobe, without any change in the front lobe's shape, you'd increase the gain just about exactly 1 dB. If you end up fattening it, you'll lose some or all of that gain. So there are some numbers for you. You'll have to do a bit of estimating if the rear lobe is fatter or skinnier than the front lobe, but now you have a number to start from. Or let's say that the front/back is 10 dB instead of 6, a more typical number for a Yagi. With the same criterion of similar lobe shapes, the power ratio for the front and rear lobes is 10:1. So if you got all that rear lobe power or energy into the front lobe without changing its shape, you'd gain a whopping 0.4 dB. If you had two equal rear lobes, both 10 dB below the front lobe, and both of the same shape as the front lobe, the power ratio of the front to all rear lobes would be 5:1, and you'd be able to increase your forward gain by 0.8 dB if you got all that rear power into the front lobe without changing its shape. So there's your actual percentage -- around 25% for a very poor Yagi, and around 10 - 20% for a fair-to-middlin' one. From which you could gain about a dB by very hard work in getting all that rear lobe power into the front lobe(*). If you question any of the calculations, I'll be glad to show how I converted ratios to dB and vice-versa, although you should be able to find this in many publications, as well as on the web. Or you can continue drawing your conclusions from cursory looks at 3D plots. Your choice. And if you don't understand then just drop the thread as it has gone on way to long with relatively little specifics with respect to the original post I'm afraid I do understand, but it's a good idea anyway. (*) Being an engineer, I didn't include placebo effect gain in the calculations. After a lot of hard work squeezing every last bit of power into that front lobe, the signals are going to *seem* a lot stronger, and the reports sure to be better. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Lewallen wrote: art wrote: I did not understand your logic. Front to back means nothing in terms of energy containment The measerment is a ratio not a quantity It also is a ratio only for a given plane and does not account for anything outside that plane. Have I stated anything wrong there? I thought your interest was in the amount of power contained in lobes other than the main lobe of a Yagi. My posting showed a simple way to relate front to back ratio, which is commonly known for many Yagis, to the fraction of power in secondary lobes, which is not. Point out the error of my ways starting with a simple dipole. Does any additional element to the array revert the radiation from the rear direction so that it is additive to the forward directive radiation of the main lobe? Of course. If so what percentage of the rearward radiation in the rear hemisphere,,(ot a planar amount) ? The question is to you Roy to answer for a one on one,It would help if you gave an actual percentage instead of a "major fraction" which you stated before In my earlier posting I apparently overestimated your ability to do what I thought was a simple calculation. So I'll do it for you so you can have a number. Since there's no "typical" Yagi, I presented one which most people would consider to be worse than average -- one having only a 6 dB front/back ratio. I also assumed for a starting point that the shape of the rear lobe (that is, beamwidth and height) is the same as the front lobe. The first calculation is to determine just what the ratio is of the powers in the front and rear lobe. The answer is 4:1. That is, the front lobe contains four times the power of the rear lobe. I am not interested in front to back for what I am looking for but this 4:1 has my interest What does it represent and how did you get it? The rear usually has more than one lobe and the reflector ndestructs or deflects the energy to 90 degrees of impact. But that 4:1 figure where does it come from? Art Since you seem to be interested in energy rather than power, simply consider the amount of energy each radiates in some amount of time: each second or other unit of time, the forward lobe radiates four times the energy of the rear lobe. What this says is that if you manage to get all the reverse-lobe power (or energy, if you prefer) into the front lobe, without any change in the front lobe's shape, you'd increase the gain just about exactly 1 dB. If you end up fattening it, you'll lose some or all of that gain. So there are some numbers for you. You'll have to do a bit of estimating if the rear lobe is fatter or skinnier than the front lobe, but now you have a number to start from. Or let's say that the front/back is 10 dB instead of 6, a more typical number for a Yagi. With the same criterion of similar lobe shapes, the power ratio for the front and rear lobes is 10:1. So if you got all that rear lobe power or energy into the front lobe without changing its shape, you'd gain a whopping 0.4 dB. If you had two equal rear lobes, both 10 dB below the front lobe, and both of the same shape as the front lobe, the power ratio of the front to all rear lobes would be 5:1, and you'd be able to increase your forward gain by 0.8 dB if you got all that rear power into the front lobe without changing its shape. So there's your actual percentage -- around 25% for a very poor Yagi, and around 10 - 20% for a fair-to-middlin' one. From which you could gain about a dB by very hard work in getting all that rear lobe power into the front lobe(*). If you question any of the calculations, I'll be glad to show how I converted ratios to dB and vice-versa, although you should be able to find this in many publications, as well as on the web. Or you can continue drawing your conclusions from cursory looks at 3D plots. Your choice. And if you don't understand then just drop the thread as it has gone on way to long with relatively little specifics with respect to the original post I'm afraid I do understand, but it's a good idea anyway. (*) Being an engineer, I didn't include placebo effect gain in the calculations. After a lot of hard work squeezing every last bit of power into that front lobe, the signals are going to *seem* a lot stronger, and the reports sure to be better. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 29 Sep 2006 05:47:14 -0700, "art" wrote:
one having only a 6 dB front/back ratio. But that 4:1 figure where does it come from? Hi Art, Do you know how to work a calculator using logarithms? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
On 29 Sep 2006 05:47:14 -0700, "art" wrote: one having only a 6 dB front/back ratio. But that 4:1 figure where does it come from? Hi Art, Do you know how to work a calculator using logarithms? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
On 29 Sep 2006 05:47:14 -0700, "art" wrote: one having only a 6 dB front/back ratio. But that 4:1 figure where does it come from? Hi Art, Do you know how to work a calculator using logarithms? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Which reminds me, I wanted to start a thread on calculators. tom K0TAR |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
art wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Since there's no "typical" Yagi, I presented one which most people would consider to be worse than average -- one having only a 6 dB front/back ratio. I also assumed for a starting point that the shape of the rear lobe (that is, beamwidth and height) is the same as the front lobe. The first calculation is to determine just what the ratio is of the powers in the front and rear lobe. The answer is 4:1. That is, the front lobe contains four times the power of the rear lobe. I am not interested in front to back for what I am looking for but this 4:1 has my interest What does it represent I can't think how I can state it any more clearly than I did in the last sentence of the text just above which you quoted. and how did you get it? When dealing with a power ratio, dB = 10 * log(ratio). Solving for ratio: ratio = 10^(dB/10) Here's where you'll probably need to get out that pocket calculator. dB is 6 (see above text), so ratio = 10^(0.6) ~ 4. Conversion between ratios and dB is a skill that anyone interested in antennas should develop. I had assumed that it was part of the knowledge required to pass a general class amateur exam, but apparently I was mistaken. If the calculator operations are too complex for you, get a chart of conversion factors which have already been calculated. The rear usually has more than one lobe True. See the remainder of my previous posting for a discussion of this. and the reflector ndestructs or deflects the energy to 90 degrees of impact. That's more nonsense. You'd develop a much better understanding of antennas (or any physical system) by developing and learning to apply some basic math skills than by dreaming up alternate explanations for well-known physical phenomena. I don't believe I can help you any more -- if indeed I've helped you at all --, and think (or at least hope) that most other readers have understood what I'm saying. So I'll bow out here. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Terman treats decibels on page 8 of the 1955 third edition of
"Electronic and Radio Engineering". The value of the decibel is 10 log of the power ratio. When the ratio of the powers is 4, the decibel value is 6. This 6 dB value applies among other things to doubling the distance between a transmitting and receiving antenna. Half as many volts will be induced in the receiver and will result in half as many amps. This is 1/4 the power induced at half the distance between antennas..This may be expressed as a positive power ratio of 4 to 1, or 6 dB. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Tape Measure Yagi Antenna Questions | Antenna | |||
| SUPER J-POLE BEATS YAGI BY 1 dB | Antenna | |||
| GP -> yagi driven element? | Antenna | |||
| Yagi, OWA and Wideband Yagi etc etc | Antenna | |||
| Quad vs Yagi (or log) | Antenna | |||