Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 17:27:31 +1000, Alan Peake
wrote: to appear as about 800 ohms and then the spacing tapered steadiy down during the descent to the horizontal transmission line which was spaced for 600 ohms. I like the tapered arrangement. What's the minimum distance needed to taper from 800 to 600 at freqs from say 3.5MHz to 14MHz? I did one years ago from 130 to 200 and it was about a foot long at 1.8GHz. Alan, Are you tapering for impedance transformation, or just to reduce transmission line losses? I make the matched line loss on a 600 ohms open wire line with 2mm dia copper spaced 150mm something approaching 0.1dB/100m, with 2:1 VSWR you are talking ~0.14dB/100m. You should find the rhombic no worse than 2:1 unless it is too short. My loss calculator has an ideal air spaced 600 ohm copper line (copper loss only) 2mm/150mm, the label is "Open / air dielectric (150/2.00)", you can try the various loads from the NEC models for more exact loss figures. Owen -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's the best Source of Info On Rhombics? | Antenna | |||
VOA Delano: 1. Uses Rhombics (still!) 2. Staff needed instructions on not getting fried! | Shortwave | |||
Rhombic for 80m | Antenna |