| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ian White GM3SEK wrote:
. . . What is undeniably true is that it *looked* spectacular! I've used many kinds of antennas since then, up to an 85ft dish, but not one of them has given me the same buzz as that rhombic. And there is the trap: buzz isn't the same thing as performance. . . . As always, Ian put his finger directly on a fundamental principle. The problem with modeling programs is that they don't model the buzz. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What's the best Source of Info On Rhombics? | Antenna | |||
| VOA Delano: 1. Uses Rhombics (still!) 2. Staff needed instructions on not getting fried! | Shortwave | |||
| Rhombic for 80m | Antenna | |||