LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #27   Report Post  
Old October 4th 06, 04:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Rhombics

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 23:27:56 -0400, "Yuri Blanarovich"
wrote:

Terman describes ducting and refraction relating to UHF


Hi Yuri,

I have a couple of refraction citations made by Ladner and Stoner in
"Short Wave Wireless Communications," 1932. They dedicate the book
to C. S. Franklin.
"Refraction may produce an appreciable increase in signal strength
at longer distances and can be expect to produce fading effects
similar to those experienced with the longer waves from the
ionosphere."

How this is achieved conforms to classic ducting, although they
neglect to call it such:
"Under certain conditions theoretical curves are available
from which the field strength at an elevated receiver,
produced from an elevated transmitter, may be deduced."

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's the best Source of Info On Rhombics? MailfrmPA Antenna 6 November 29th 04 05:46 PM
VOA Delano: 1. Uses Rhombics (still!) 2. Staff needed instructions on not getting fried! http://HireMe.geek.nz/ Shortwave 0 October 19th 04 08:07 AM
Rhombic for 80m Dan Yemiola Antenna 4 February 23rd 04 03:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017