Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 06, 10:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.ham-radio.hf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Hf Antenna Question

wrote:
Why worry about VHF though?


Because MFJ advertises 2m operation with the
recommended coil of coax?
--
73, Cecil
http://www.w5dxp.com
  #2   Report Post  
Old October 21st 06, 12:52 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.ham-radio.hf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Hf Antenna Question

Chris W wrote:
I have been looking at the MFJ-1622 antenna. Part of the instructions
for antenna set up, which you can find here....
http://www.mfjenterprises.com/man/pdf/MFJ-1622.pdf
say to roll up about 30 feet of coax into a 12" diameter coil. This
they label as a choke. This just seems like a "duct tape" solution to
me. Is there a better way to accomplish the same thing? Would a few
ferrite beads on the coax do the trick or do I just have no idea what I
am talking about?


I have an EXCEL calculator which indicates that particular
coiled coax choke should have maximum effectiveness around
~8 MHz. So it probably does a reasonable job on 40m-20m.
Unfortunately, it will reach 1/2WL self resonance somewhere
around ~16 MHz and thus be essentially useless 17m-2m because
of self-capacitance shorting out the choking impedance. Anyone
who says a particular coiled coax choke will cover 40m-2m is
mistaken. However, the stress on the choke is reduced because
the MFJ antenna appears to be resonant, i.e. a low feedpoint
impedance.

Here are some actual measurements.

http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html

In a nutshell, the coiled coax choke works well over a
frequency range of 2:1 (conservative) or 3:1 (liberal).
The beads in the above measurements work well over a
frequency range of 4:1. It's hard to beat stacked ferrite
toroids of differing materials as a foundation for an
excellent all-HF-band 1:1 choke-balun. I know of no
single balun that can cover 7 MHz to 148 MHz well.
1/2WL self-resonance defeats the choking action when
trying to cover 4+ octaves.

I recently used an MFJ-259B to measure the choking
impedance of 8 turns of RG-400 on a 5.35" form. The
choking impedance dropped below 650 ohms at 4.63 MHz
on the low end and 28.1 MHz on the high end. 650 ohms
is not enough choking impedance for all-HF-band ladder-
line fed dipoles. Assuming SWR ranging up to 18:1, which
is the case for my all-HF-band 130 ft. dipole, the choke-
balun may encounter as much as 8000 ohms looking into
the Z0=450 ohm ladder-line.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 21st 06, 07:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.ham-radio.hf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 303
Default Hf Antenna Question

It's hard to beat stacked ferrite
toroids of differing materials as a foundation for an
excellent all-HF-band 1:1 choke-balun. I know of no
single balun that can cover 7 MHz to 148 MHz well.
1/2WL self-resonance defeats the choking action when
trying to cover 4+ octaves.


Can you direct me to more good information (as in NOT sales literature)
about ferrites and toroids as choke baluns?

The ARRL Handbook mentions the use of 1:1 baluns on p. 21.16
(Transmission Lines):
For 3.5 to 30 MHz, the recommended choke is 10 ft and 7 turns using
RG-8, 58, 59,8X and 213 (I don't think I've even heard of the last two)

W2DU has a 50 bead balun over RG-303.

As you may recall, I am using a homemade G5RV and I simply connected
RG-8 directly to the ladderline portion. I can see this connection
right out my window (2nd floor shack). I am unaware of any significant
problems as it is. Should I consider using one of these methods and
re-do my antenna?

Thanks for being one of the experts that doesn't talk down to the "rest
of us".

John
AB8O
  #4   Report Post  
Old October 21st 06, 09:55 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.ham-radio.hf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Hf Antenna Question

jawod wrote:
As you may recall, I am using a homemade G5RV and I simply connected
RG-8 directly to the ladderline portion. I can see this connection
right out my window (2nd floor shack). I am unaware of any significant
problems as it is. Should I consider using one of these methods and
re-do my antenna?


Are you having problems with RF-in-the-shack? If not,
your feedline radiation may be doing you more good than
harm. I'm a purist. I install a very good balun/choke at
every BALanced to UNbalanced junction. Some people are
good and some people are lucky. If you have a current
maximum common-mode loop in the shack, you may not even
notice it. It's those voltage maximums that tend to bite.

Thanks for being one of the experts that doesn't talk down to the "rest
of us".


Heh-heh, I only talk down to the gurus for the purpose of
creating a crossed transactional analysis. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 06, 12:43 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,alt.ham-radio.hf
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 44
Default Hf Antenna Question


jawod wrote:
Can you direct me to more good information (as in NOT sales literature)
about ferrites and toroids as choke baluns?



Here are some actual measurements of coax and ferrite chokes. Tests
done with a Hewlett-Packard 4193A vector impedance meter.

http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Optimising a G5RV Owen Duffy Antenna 20 October 3rd 06 06:38 PM
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] RHF Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 06:03 PM
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question RHF Shortwave 0 September 21st 05 10:15 AM
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017