Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Nov 2006 04:49:06 -0800, "Toni" wrote:
Hi, I'm moving to a new urban QTH in and trying to figure out the best HF antenna installation. I'd like to have distinct HF antennas for RX and TX: a vertical for TX where only performance matters and "something" for RX where the main problem is going to be tons and tons of local QRM. I don't know what could be this "something". I'd probably like some kind of loop or small dipole or whatever I can point and can be isolated as much as possible from local noise received in the supporting mast and feed line themselves. It should be something physically small because of neighbors, etc. I'd prefer to build them myself but would buy them if something seemed interesting enough. Feedline is going to be about 100 ft long What would be your suggestion? Thanks Toni, If you want separate antennas, (aerials), and IF you have the room, (hence the 100 ft feed line), and IF you want to build the thing your self. . . Might I suggest for your receiver, a Caged Dipole? In the more modern world, it is referred to as a Fat Conductor Antenna. I asked a little bit about them here, and found out a lot more than I thought I would have, being that these are just about extinct. They offer many possibilities for what I believe you are looking for in a receive end application. 73's KD7YMR Rob |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RF Systems MTA (WAS) New Antenna- WOO HOO | Shortwave | |||
Loop Antennas / minijack works-clips don't / impedence?? | Shortwave | |||
I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
How Many : Inverted "L" Antenna Radials for a Receiving Only Antenna ? | Shortwave |