In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:34:01 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

Who gives a **** dip****? So why don't you cut and run to the
refrigerator and make yourself a crow sandwich?

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:34:01 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

No. You show us.

http://elections.us.reuters.com/?WTm...t-Top2-GoTo-11

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:23:01 -0600, wrote:
I am a retard.I can't follow up?
cuhulin

Maybe it's webtv that won't allow you. Here's an excerpt from the Reuters
story that the retards couldn't find (it's been all over the Sunday cable
talkathons too):

"... even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a
Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat
or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.

"Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would
keep the administration "from doing what is necessary to combat
terrorism," and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too
much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals."

-- Reuters @ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N11417154.htm

[Guvf fcnpr erfreirq sbe gur ergneqf gb fcva gur fgbel.]

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:48:09 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:23:01 -0600, wrote:
I am a retard.I can't follow up?
cuhulin

Maybe it's webtv that won't allow you. Here's an excerpt from the Reuters
story that the retards couldn't find (it's been all over the Sunday cable
talkathons too):

"... even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a
Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat
or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.

"Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would
keep the administration "from doing what is necessary to combat
terrorism," and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too
much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals."

-- Reuters @ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N11417154.htm

++++++++++
I see you skipped over the part where the Shrub's approval rating fell
from a low of 35% to a new low of 31%. Thus, notwithstanding any
concerns, the voters found the need to pull the rug out from under the
Shrub to be compelling.

[Guvf fcnpr erfreirq sbe gur ergneqf gb fcva gur fgbel.]

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 19:48:09 +0000 (UTC), Lloyd
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 12:23:01 -0600, wrote:
I am a retard.I can't follow up?
cuhulin

Maybe it's webtv that won't allow you. Here's an excerpt from the Reuters
story that the retards couldn't find (it's been all over the Sunday cable
talkathons too):

"... even more said they were concerned about some of the actions a
Democratic Congress might take, including 78 percent who were somewhat
or very concerned that it would seek too hasty a withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.

"Another 69 percent said they were concerned that the new Congress would
keep the administration "from doing what is necessary to combat
terrorism," and two-thirds said they were concerned it would spend too
much time investigating the administration and Republican scandals."

-- Reuters @ http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N11417154.htm

[Guvf fcnpr erfreirq sbe gur ergneqf gb fcva gur fgbel.]


It says ''concerned'', not ''afraid''.

Lloyd wrote:
In addition, a whopping 78% of Americans are afraid that the Dems will
cut and run. It seems that the vote was a protest vote and that the
Dems are still on the wrong side of public opinion. Source: Reuters
(Look the rest up yourself.)

Can't seem to face the facts of the election, huh?
Why not post this nonsense in one of your neocon cry-in-your-beer
newsgroups and just leave antennas to the rest of us.

I feel your pain. But it doesn't have anything to do with gain

X-rated Vermonter wrote in
:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:18:49 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Why don't you go learn Morse in Arabic so you can spend your spare
time looking to intercept terrorist messages?


ROTFLMAO!

At least then he would stop bothering the rest of us!

X-rated Vermonter wrote in
:

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:18:49 GMT, Slow Code wrote:

Why don't you go learn Morse in Arabic so you can spend your spare
time looking to intercept terrorist messages?


I don't need to. That's why we have President Bush. Now I should learned
arabic have if I had known Bill Clintoon and the democrats weren't going
to do anything about the terrorists before Bush got in.

That's the problem with democrats, they hate America, so they don't care
if terrorists attack us. Democrats would rather attack the Bible.

SC

Brenda Ann wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...

That's the problem with democrats, they hate America, so they don't care
if terrorists attack us. Democrats would rather attack the Bible.



Have any of you the remotest idea how insanely stupid that crap sounds?



Yeah, SC is lame even as a troll. It's a shame what happens to
Mediaeval minds in a technocratic society. I use the term "mind" here
rather loosely.