Jim Kelley wrote:
So they bet on the wrong horse. You might be doing the same thing,

I have faith in my beliefs. :-)

Most theories are necessarily incorrect.

Except for yours, of course. :-)
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

Jimmie D wrote:

It is entirely possible that the galaxies are moving further apart(red
shift) even though the universe itself may be shrinking.

Assuming negative volume in phase space. :-)

73, ac6xg

Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:
So they bet on the wrong horse. You might be doing the same thing,

I have faith in my beliefs. :-)

And maybe that is a separator there, Cecil. I'm pretty sure of my
position, but I don't have faith in it. Once enough evidence comes along
to disprove it, I'll jump ship in a minute.


Most theories are necessarily incorrect.

Except for yours, of course. :-)

ah, a paradox!

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:

So they bet on the wrong horse. You might be doing the same thing,


I have faith in my beliefs. :-)

Most theories are necessarily incorrect.


Except for yours, of course. :-)

:-)
There's theory, and then there's fact. I have some of the latter.
But it's the smart guys like you who tend to come up with the theories.

73, ac6xg

"Any good theory should always be consistent with the facts."

Jim Kelley

Michael Coslo wrote:
I'm pretty sure of my
position, but I don't have faith in it.

If your position is not worthy of any faith
at all, why do you believe in it?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Jim Kelley wrote:
There's theory, and then there's fact.

What fact????
You can't even prove that you exist. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:

There's theory, and then there's fact.


What fact????

Do you not believe in fact, Cecil?

You can't even prove that you exist. :-)

There's evidence indicating that I do, and none indicating that I
don't. So I'm at least a valid theory. What I can't prove is that I
don't exist. For a number of reasons.

73, Jim AC6XG

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
om...
Jim Kelley wrote:
There's theory, and then there's fact.

What fact????
You can't even prove that you exist. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com


Descartes said; "I think, therefore I am. Probably
would say today, " I think I am, therefore I may be"
Even philosophers tend to hedge their bets now, I reckon .

Harold
KD5SAK

Jim Kelley wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote:

There's theory, and then there's fact.


What fact????

Do you not believe in fact, Cecil?

You can't even prove that you exist. :-)

There's evidence indicating that I do, and none indicating that I
don't. So I'm at least a valid theory. What I can't prove is that I
don't exist. For a number of reasons.

73, Jim AC6XG


Personally Jim, I doubt your existence. I have a theory you are much
more likely to be a "brain in a bottle", you are nothing more than a
brain in some aliens laboratory and housed within life support
equipment, the body you see as yours is only imagined and a very good
illusion.

Some of us here are just like you, but I am real (a "control" in the
experiment you are involved in.) And, I do understand how all this can
be so confusing.

Regards,
JS

kd5sak wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
om...

Jim Kelley wrote:

There's theory, and then there's fact.

What fact????
You can't even prove that you exist. :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com



Descartes said; "I think, therefore I am. Probably
would say today, " I think I am, therefore I may be"
Even philosophers tend to hedge their bets now, I reckon .


Descartes was in a parade at the University of Poitiers one year. They
also had a fine stallion they wanted to show off. The owner of the horse
and the parade organizer had a big argument over who would go first
until they agreed to put Descartes before the horse.


- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -