Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article , C. J. Clegg wrote: So, my questions are... Take my answers as best-guesstimates, please, rather than as gospel! 1. How do I determine the overall antenna length that will give me the most efficient (which is to say, the least inefficient) performance across the 4 to 9 MHz range? A range greater than 2:1 means that you're almost certainly going to run into at least one operating frequency at which the antenna itself is an extremely difficult load (very low, very high, and/or very reactive) and that most of your power is going to end up in the terminating resistor. Since his range is just slightly more than 2:1, I wonder if he can pick the resonance so that the thing is not full wave at any frequency of interest. Either Mouser or Digikey had 50 W non inductive resistors. Tam/WB2TT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Starting point for antenna design | Antenna | |||
Eton Porsche Design P7131 Questions | Shortwave | |||
The main problem with Ham radio... | Policy | |||
BiQuad Design Specifications for Microwave? | Antenna | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |