LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 4th 06, 01:57 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 137
Default Auto tuners & verticals

A really good amateur project would be to combine the smart controller
of a modern auto-ATU with your own individual collection of large
inductors, capacitors and relays.


That really would be great. I'm keeping that in mind for some day.

For a non-random-wire installation and not too many bands, you can go
with manual switching of networks. When I lived in an apartment, I
had a magnet wire antenna that consisted of two random lengths fed in
the "middle." As such, every time the antenna broke and I put it back
up, I needed a new match on each band. This is the kind of a situation
where an autotuner really shines; I decided to use a remote manual
tuner instead:

http://www.n3ox.net/projects/servo

When I moved into a house, I was able to put up something a little
sturdier for the lower bands. Since it's always the same radiator
and always the same ground system, I'm just using switched L-networks
at the base to match it. It's 40 feet tall; the 80m matching network
is a 20 turn tapped coil, #10 copper wire, about 3.5 inches in
diameter. The other matching networks have air variable caps and 2"
self-supporting #10 coils.

http://www.n3ox.net/projects/lowbandvert

John, if you're thinking of using a 33 foot vertical on 160,80, and the
higher bands, might I suggest an approach where you use a GIANT tapped
coil matching scheme for 160m, taps switched with a big relay, and then
have relays to select whether you're using the 160m/80m matching
network or the autotuner. For both of these bands, an inductor with
the bottom end attached to the ground system with a tap near the bottom
for the feedline and a tap up further for the antenna should work fine.
It's basically an L-L step-up L network.

The autotuner should be fairly efficient on 40m and up, though you
might want to add a few feet to the vertical to avoid the high
impedance of a half wavelength on 20m, but I dunno.

It's really the bands where the vertical is significantly shorter than
a 1/4 wavelength where you need a high-Q matching network.

Dan

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ? Bob Miller Shortwave 40 September 3rd 12 02:15 PM
FA: PAIR OF RARE MILLER AT-2500 2.5KW Auto Tuners Bob Rinaldi w1cny Boatanchors 0 June 23rd 06 04:45 PM
FA: PAIR OF RARE MILLER AT-2500 2.5KW Auto Tuners Bob Rinaldi w1cny Boatanchors 0 June 20th 06 06:34 PM
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ? Slow Code Shortwave 5 March 9th 06 11:51 PM
Auto tuners Gene Antenna 1 September 12th 03 04:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017