| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... Imagine that you have a highly directional transmitting antenna and you spin it at, say, 100 revolutions per second. What would a listener at a fixed location hear? He would hear a 100 Hz (but non-sinusoidal) amplitude modulated signal rather than a constant amplitude CW tone. The shape of the modulation envelope would be dictated by the shape of the antenna pattern. The spectral content, i.e., sidebands, of the received signal would be the same as if the wave had been amplitude modulated by conventional means to produce the same waveshape. I think that's what they mean. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Jimmie D wrote: I was going through some FAA course material on Instument Landing Systems and the term SPACE MODULATION was mentioned several times. What the heck is this. From what I gather signals modulate each other out in space without benifit of any nonlinear device. I personally beleave this cannot happen but here is a reference to an FAA document.I assume they know what they are talking about. Abstract : The report describes an investigation into the cause of incompatibility between ground and airborne measurements of VOR space modulation when using the latest flight inspection receiver, FA-4165:3A. The effort included a survey of the existing procedures and equipment used throughout the FAA, an evaluation of the ground measurement technique, and an evaluation of the airborne measurement technique. The result of the investigation identified problem areas with both the ground and airborne techniques. I suspect that space modulation is more of a concept used to more easily understand/teach the operation of ILS systems and that actual modulation takes place in the receiver. Jimmie Roy I can kind of see this in a VOR with its rotating antenna but in ILS systems(glideslopes and localizers) there is no moving antenna. They talk about AM sidebands being formed due to space modulation. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:13:10 -0500, "Jimmie D"
wrote: Roy I can kind of see this in a VOR with its rotating antenna but in ILS systems(glideslopes and localizers) there is no moving antenna. They talk about AM sidebands being formed due to space modulation. Hi Jimmie, I worked on this gear, and more, 30 years ago. Any discussion of space was physical space. I was involved only with the instrumentation, but the system specification is characterized in terms of "signal-in-space." As such, the modulations vary by the aircraft's position in airspace. This can be in terms of distance, bearing, slope, or path. In some regions of space, the modulations change from dash to dash-dot to dots. Shared with these are phase relationships in both modulation and beam coverage. Testing of these system parameters is tightly controlled so as to not create hazardously misleading information to general aviation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:13:10 -0500, "Jimmie D" wrote: Roy I can kind of see this in a VOR with its rotating antenna but in ILS systems(glideslopes and localizers) there is no moving antenna. They talk about AM sidebands being formed due to space modulation. Hi Jimmie, I worked on this gear, and more, 30 years ago. Any discussion of space was physical space. I was involved only with the instrumentation, but the system specification is characterized in terms of "signal-in-space." As such, the modulations vary by the aircraft's position in airspace. This can be in terms of distance, bearing, slope, or path. In some regions of space, the modulations change from dash to dash-dot to dots. Shared with these are phase relationships in both modulation and beam coverage. Testing of these system parameters is tightly controlled so as to not create hazardously misleading information to general aviation. OM, I'd appreciate any pointers you have to the FAA reference material that defines "Space Modulation". Google shows only links to lists of training courses that the FAA conducts, and references to "Pulse space modulation", which I assume is a different thing. TIA. 73, William (No cc: of ng posts needed, thanks) -- A little learning is a dang'rous thing; Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring; There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain, And drinking largely sobers us again. -- Alexander Pope, Essay on Criticism |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
nonoise wrote:
Richard Clark wrote: On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 05:13:10 -0500, "Jimmie D" wrote: Roy I can kind of see this in a VOR with its rotating antenna but in ILS systems(glideslopes and localizers) there is no moving antenna. They talk about AM sidebands being formed due to space modulation. Hi Jimmie, I worked on this gear, and more, 30 years ago. Any discussion of space was physical space. I was involved only with the instrumentation, but the system specification is characterized in terms of "signal-in-space." As such, the modulations vary by the aircraft's position in airspace. This can be in terms of distance, bearing, slope, or path. In some regions of space, the modulations change from dash to dash-dot to dots. Shared with these are phase relationships in both modulation and beam coverage. Testing of these system parameters is tightly controlled so as to not create hazardously misleading information to general aviation. OM, I'd appreciate any pointers you have to the FAA reference material that defines "Space Modulation". Google shows only links to lists of training courses that the FAA conducts, and references to "Pulse space modulation", which I assume is a different thing. TIA. 73, William (No cc: of ng posts needed, thanks) Do a GOOGLE search on "Space Modulation" You will find the occasional pearl among the trash. There is an article about VOR's and Space Modulation. What follows is exactly what I understood about the contents: THE, AND, etc. In other words nothing. HI HI... Dave N |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 13:59:08 -0500, nonoise
""william_warren_nonoise\"@speakeasy.(nonoise)net " wrote: FAA reference material that defines "Space Modulation" Hi William, There is no definition because it isn't part of the argot. The point of my posting is that the Space of Space Modulation is physical space, an area or volume in the flight path where all signals are targeted. This is not about mixing, non-linear or otherwise. It is also not about modulation waveforms except in how they are intercepted and recognized by existing equipment (and thus giving rise to HMI, hazardously misleading information). It is not that there is anything "in" space that is doing any modulation. There is nothing inherent "about" space that affects modulation. Space itself does not modulate. There is no modulation that requires space to complete it (except in the classic sense of propagation). There is VOR space. There is ILS space. There is TACAN space. and on and on and on. Each is overlapping modulation in ostensibly the same space. Thus we have VOR space Modulation.... 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| YOU PUNCED | Swap | |||
| International Space Station School Contacts on Oct 5th, 6th 7th | General | |||
| International Space Station School Contacts on Oct 5th, 6th 7th | Shortwave | |||
| INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION LIVE ON ECHOLINK MARCH 8th TUES 1410GMT | General | |||
| INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION LIVE ON ECHOLINK MARCH 8th TUES 1410GMT | Policy | |||