Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 10:49:08 +0100, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote: Do you appreciate the difference? Hi Tony, Nope. The meter is always in a condition where current is flowing given that it shares the cathode load. Paragraph 5-5 says quite clearly how to set zero for a zero signal condition. Basically, the design reveals an admission that there is no "zero" in the first place (merely a minimum). Aside from that, there is no need to be concerned about a meter reading for a receiver that is turned off. In short, any attempt to force a mechanical zero would be negated by the "electrical zero" set and S-9 calibration. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
SWR meter kaput? | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |