Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil, you don't have to postulate a non linear breakdown within the
dielectric to explain the transfer of energy from the charged particle striking the surface of the insulation to the free electrons on the wire... Capacitance will handle that nicely... As you stated, a thicker insulator makes a quieter antenna under static conditions... Capacity effect would seem to answer that... If you don't like that, a charged particle striking the dielectric surface suffers an abrupt change in motion... A charge changing motion has it's own method of talking to us... And, lastly, we have not roundly beaten the water droplet for dripping off the antenna and taking a charge with it... "Bartenner, I'll have one, hic, for the road."... denny / k8do |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mr. Static - Index: The On-Line Resource for Static-Related Compliance Issues | Shortwave | |||
question re GE Superadio III static | Dx | |||
question re GE Superadio III static | Dx | |||
Road static? | Antenna | |||
FM Reception Static Problem | Antenna |