Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
But the academic books on Antenna theory written by Professors of Electromagnetics all use image theory for vertical monopole antennas including those with elevated radials. Can anyone quote an antenna theory book that does not? Kraus, _Antennas_ Johnson, _Antenna Engineering Handbook_ Lo and Lee, _Antenna Handbook_ Balanis, _Antenna Theory_ King and Harrison, _Antennas and Waves_ Jordan & Balmain, _Elecromagnetic Waves and Radiating Systems_ King, Mimno, and Wing, _Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Wave Guides_ Brown, Sharpe, Hughes, and Post, _Lines, Waves, and Antennas_ Stutzman & Thiele, _Antenna Theory and Design_ to name a few. I'm sure there are many more, but those are the ones currently on my shelf. Several of these authors use an image to analyze a vertical antenna over a perfectly conducting ground of infinite extent. None use it for any other situation, including elevated radials. And for a very good reason -- it's not valid for other situations. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
balun and image | Shortwave | |||
A "single conversion" question | Shortwave | |||
And Incase Lennie Doubted that MARS and Amateur Radio are a "Service to the Nation..." MARS Chief Says Otherwise | Policy | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment |