Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Anthony Farrelly wrote:
Isn't the whole question of whether it's a reflection as from a conducting plate, or radiation from the radials based on misunderstanding what a reflection is? There is no contradiction in quantum electrodynamics. A photon encounters an electron in a radial and is absorbed. Later, that same electron emits a photon. The original photon energy could have come from anywhere. If it came from the vertical element in the first place, it is a "reflection" but that is irrelevant. If it came from that same radial in the first place, it is not a "reflection" but that is also irrelevant. If it bounced off a flagpole before it was absorbed by the electron, it is a "reflection" but no rational person cares. The photon cloud surrounding a radial contains photons that came from that radial and from everywhere else. That some photons must be put in a basket labeled "reflected" and some put in a basket labeled "not reflected" is simply nonsense. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
balun and image | Shortwave | |||
A "single conversion" question | Shortwave | |||
And Incase Lennie Doubted that MARS and Amateur Radio are a "Service to the Nation..." MARS Chief Says Otherwise | Policy | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment |