Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

David
Calm down,
the die has been cast
and people know that you had the chance but not the education to take
part in it.
This newsgroup is for debate and you were the one to take up the axe
but when put to the test failed to show up.
I think people will wonder why you ran away after all that talking,
and you keep coming back at me for some reason.

You must admit that others who are reading this are wondering why you
deiced not to put me into the middle ages, there wasn't any conditions
imposed not one and you talked about all the experience you have with
different programs anbd because I didn't pose any conditions fell back
on the notion or position that the programs are no good unless you know
what you are doing.
Yet you try to tell me you are knoweledgable about programs. David it
would be better if you got off my back and hope that people will forget
your postering and what happened when you were
challenged...........sad.......sad......sad

but help is comming a newcomer just joined in, he may be the one who
will take your place, he may be an antenna expert in disguise.....
a few days will tell

With sympathy
Art KB9MZ........XG
yes I am english born, what are you going to make of that if you are
looking for something?



Dave wrote:
"Mike Lucas" wrote in message
. ..

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own
statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with
respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?

Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself,
as many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR

then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do
this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its
deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his
erroneous theories.

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

David
Calm down,
the die has been cast
and people know that you had the chance but not the education to take
part in it.
This newsgroup is for debate and you were the one to take up the axe
but when put to the test failed to show up.
I think people will wonder why you ran away after all that talking,
and you keep coming back at me for some reason.

You must admit that others who are reading this are wondering why you
deiced not to put me into the middle ages, there wasn't any conditions
imposed not one and you talked about all the experience you have with
different programs anbd because I didn't pose any conditions fell back
on the notion or position that the programs are no good unless you know
what you are doing.
Yet you try to tell me you are knoweledgable about programs. David it
would be better if you got off my back and hope that people will forget
your postering and what happened when you were
challenged...........sad.......sad......sad

but help is comming a newcomer just joined in, he may be the one who
will take your place, he may be an antenna expert in disguise.....
a few days will tell

With sympathy
Art KB9MZ........XG
yes I am english born, what are you going to make of that if you are
looking for something?



Dave wrote:
"Mike Lucas" wrote in message
. ..

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own
statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with
respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?

Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself,
as many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR

then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do
this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its
deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his
erroneous theories.

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art


Mike Lucas wrote:
"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?

Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as
many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art


Mike Lucas wrote:
"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?

Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as
many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art


Mike Lucas wrote:
"art" wrote in message
oups.com...

Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab

insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue
within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect
to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow
your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated.
So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the
possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any
program of you choice?
I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust
because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults
that have no grounding so I give up and will submit.
I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only
talked and for what reason?

Further snip of rant

Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be
helping,
rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as
many of us lurkers
find this thread of considerable entertainment value.

Mike W5CHR

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art

Which part?

The part where you top post, the part where you never snip the old
junk, or the part where you don't believe in paragraphs which makes
your stuff a royal pain in the ass to read?

snip old stuff

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

On 28 Dec 2006 15:27:29 -0800, "art" wrote:

Richard
Richard
Richard and
Richard

Hi Art,

And I thought only Gauss could claim your heart.

If you can't write about your 5 wires in the air, let's analyze your
purple prose which has all the style of a crucifixion in a burlesque
passion play.

You choose.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

Welcome, bring your friends, let them see for themselves what ham radio
is all about.
The more the merrier. Richard and Roy have flogged this newsgroup for
more than a decade and got rid of many a good ham so only are a few
left but I am not going anywhere. I want as many people as I possibly
can to see where I called their bluff and they ran away.

Here we are a ham radio newsgroup doing what we should be doing,
pulling people down scratching peoples eyes out anything to get an
augument going this is what Richard and Roy have been doing for years
and there are always suckers who will follow them.
And now the code went up in flames and a few more disatisfied hams will
get the ball rolling on another lengthy augument. If you really want to
do something for ham radio tell your friends to come and have a look
see as we are becoming quite a diverse group here and they all will
probably fit in quite well. And yes point out how I was hammered by the
so called experts on antennas and when I called their bluff they ran
away Dave was his name egged on by Richard who is.. well I wont go
into that,,, reading this will provide a good lesson for a lot of
newbies in than when you are given advise by people postering as
experts alway but always get a second or third opinion otherwise you
may run into somebody like I did. Please, please call your friends so
they can see what ham radio is all about, the more the merrier, their
are a lot of people here willing to give advice and they aren't shy. Oh
and by the way we follow the army thinking on this newsgroup meaning
don't ask,don't tell so you will never know the person you are getting
close to,don't say I didn't warn you.
Art






wrote:
art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art

Which part?

The part where you top post, the part where you never snip the old
junk, or the part where you don't believe in paragraphs which makes
your stuff a royal pain in the ass to read?

snip old stuff

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade

Art

How can we miss it with the multi-postings? But in order for *you*
to see the charade, I'm afraid a mirror will be needed.
You **** and whine because no one can understand the silly
jibber jabber you throw out...
You **** and whine because no one will try to do or repeat work *you*
should be doing, or already have done.
The solution to your problem is actually very simple, and Dave has
already
given it to you. Build the dang thing and see if it works as you say
on an antenna range.
If it works as you say, *maybe* someone will see a use in it.
If they do, *maybe* you can sell it. Simple. You don't even have to be
born in England to fiqure that one out. A dumbass redneck Texan
like I can see that simple solution in a half second.
If you build it, and it works, maybe they will come.
If you build it and it doesn't work, probably they won't.
To foist among the public a "miracle whip" which you haven't even
taken time to test in the real world is the ultimate charade.
I can make a puter modeling program spit out nearly anything I want
if I caress it in a favorable manner. I imagine others can too. Ask
Cecil about his dipoles that show in excess of 20 dbi.. Sure the
"supergain" can be there *if* you can get power to the antenna with
that super low feedpoint Z. Good luck in the contest trying to achieve
this
task. I bet I could keep up with you using a regular coax fed dipole
and
5 watts power.
You seem to require our permission for you to tinker with this new
miracle whip array. Well, you have my official permission to knock
yourself out.
BTW, why is it that you can't make post without whining about Roy,
Richard, Dave, etc, etc.
I was building a new fangled miracle whip, and they told me it wouldn't

work as planned, I'd tend to listen to them myself. If I had trouble
believing
them, I would build a real antenna instead of arguing about it on
usenet.
If your theory? is correct, it should work as planned. If not.. Well...
Time to conjur up a new miracle whip.
Lurk mode off, and back to those silly boat wrecking rednecks in
Deliverence..
MK

Gaussian law and time varying fields
 

art wrote:
Welcome, bring your friends, let them see for themselves what ham radio
is all about.
The more the merrier. Richard and Roy have flogged this newsgroup for
more than a decade and got rid of many a good ham so only are a few
left but I am not going anywhere. I want as many people as I possibly
can to see where I called their bluff and they ran away.

Here we are a ham radio newsgroup doing what we should be doing,
pulling people down scratching peoples eyes out anything to get an
augument going this is what Richard and Roy have been doing for years
and there are always suckers who will follow them.
And now the code went up in flames and a few more disatisfied hams will
get the ball rolling on another lengthy augument. If you really want to
do something for ham radio tell your friends to come and have a look
see as we are becoming quite a diverse group here and they all will
probably fit in quite well. And yes point out how I was hammered by the
so called experts on antennas and when I called their bluff they ran
away Dave was his name egged on by Richard who is.. well I wont go
into that,,, reading this will provide a good lesson for a lot of
newbies in than when you are given advise by people postering as
experts alway but always get a second or third opinion otherwise you
may run into somebody like I did. Please, please call your friends so
they can see what ham radio is all about, the more the merrier, their
are a lot of people here willing to give advice and they aren't shy. Oh
and by the way we follow the army thinking on this newsgroup meaning
don't ask,don't tell so you will never know the person you are getting
close to,don't say I didn't warn you.
Art


Woe is Art. Yes, it is true. We have bludgened poor ole Art into
obvious
submission. Beaten down, bloody, but not whipped yet!!!, sayeth Art.
Isn't flogging the practice of using those tassled whips against ones
own
body, or am I thinking of something else. I may be confused, cuz I R A
redneck. If I'm thinking of the correct term and practice, then this
would fit well.
Why? Cuz every time I read one of your posts, I get the impression you
are
flogging yourself with one of those tassled leather whips.
To an innocent bystander, this might give the impression that Art is
battling a mighty heavy fly problem. Or maybe he itches badly.. I
dunno..
Woe is Art.
Woe is Art's latest antenna too.. There I said it. A big slap with the
tassled
miracle whip I give to thee.. :/
Woe is Art.
MK