Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello all - I hope someone can help me figure this one out:
I just put up a 20 meter monoband today. Been working on it for a week of nights, and got it in the air when I got off work today early. I used the 234/f formula and cut it for around 14.100 mHz which gave a length of 16 feet 7 inches. It was a a bear to hoist up (my XYL helped me) - the base is only about 12 feet off the ground (my only mounting option). I put up 4 identical-length radials, 3 of which are quite close to 45 degrees, the 4th is is only about 10 degrees down due to mounting issues. The coax feed is about 40 feet (RG-58 - good quality). I wound a 4" form with 10 turns at the base of the antenna and another 10 turns at the transmitter to try to keep the feed line 'out of the loop' (is this wrong?) I find it is REALLY broad - is this normal for a monoband? I have only used trap verticals before. The SWR is 1.5:1 from 14.025 up to around 14.200 - very little change. It is actually hitting resonance somewhere around 14.600 (using MFJ meter when out of band). (See 'Problem' below) Construction: Copper water pipe, 10' of which is 3/4" then 5' of 1/2" and finally a 1/4" section that is the 'tuning end'. For the radials, I made a circle of 14-ga antenna wire around the 2x4 wood support on brass hooks (one each side) that support the radials - diameter of the radial 'circle' is about 6" or so - not very large circle. Radials were cut exactly the length of the antenna and are well insulated with ceramic eggs and poly line, angles as stated above. Copper element is suported by 1.5" ceramic stand-off insulators from the Oak + 2x4 treated wood support. Problem: My TS-440s (AT) without the tuner only puts out about 60 watts in CW and RTTY segments, and only hits full power in the upper end of the SSB band UNLESS I use the internal tuner - then I get a full power output in CW since the transmitter is 'faked' into believing it is resonant. During my late night (illegal 30 second) test, I get 110 watts at 14.600 with almost no visible SWR - clearly the resonant frequency... Questions: Question 1: Are mono-band verticals always this broadbanded or do I have something wrong? It does not seem to have much Q. SWR only very slowly creeps up over the band... (I loaded at power at 14.600 VERY FAST late at night - please don't give me a ticket Mr. FCC! - and the SWR was almost unreadable it was so low - the MFJ meter is right - that is my resonance point). My old 4BTV was 'sharp as a tack' in tuning... VERY high Q. Are mono-bands less selective? Question 2: Am I being overly concerned? I can use the Auto Tuner in the TS-440 to make it happy without any problem... is this ok? Question 3: I built this antenna to be good for my Oak Hills QRP rig - I had hoped not to have a tuner in the loop - I use a Kenwood AT-180 when I'm not on the TS-440s - is the loss that significant? Again, am I being overly concerned, since the AT-180 very easily tunes out the difference? Or should I tweak on this antenna until it is perfect for CW SWR? Question 4: I understand the radials are a major part of the design - could it be that the 'formula' (234/f) was correct, but somehow my radials are a bit off and could make the difference without adjust the 16' 7" vertical length? Question 5: Since I made the 'radial circle' about 6" diameter around the base of the antenna, but then connected the radials (cut exactly the length of the radiator, less the 'radial circle' of wire around the base, attached to the brass hooks used to support the radials) could this be de-tuning the antenna enuf to raise the frequency (seems it should LOWER in frequency if anything)? If you 'wiser' hams advise, I'll certainly drop the antenna (after cutting the radials loose) and enlist my XYL to help again, and add a couple of inches of copper to the ends (and too the radials) and do it all agin... but it was not easy to do in the first place... (The antenna only weighs 25 pounds, but OMG lifting it up to position felt like it weighed 250 pounds!!) How it performs: I found during on-the-air tests that SOME signals were significantly better over my 200' "random wire" and some were worse. Consensus was that there was almost no difference 'short haul' (coast to coast). Some signals are not at all audible on my 200' wire, but S7 on the vertical, for example... no DX today so no idea if the low angle is working or not... But what about at QRP levels? With my AT-180 tuner? Just seems that I should hit my ideal SWR in the 14.060 range - rather than 14.600 despite the broad-band performance. What do you recommend I do at this point? I have the whole weekend to either play with the new antenna or quit obsessing over it :-) Thanks for replies and putting up with my long-winded posting. Please either post here or at my email address of many thanks, Dave WB7AWK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . | Shortwave | |||
Par Electronics EF-SWL Antenna | Shortwave | |||
I Want Another Antenna | Shortwave | |||
The MAGIC of the Hundred Foot (100') Long {Random} Wire Antenna for the Shortwave Listener (SWL). | Shortwave |