| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello Cecil:
Once again, I extend thanks to you for your 'elmering'. I understood your response completely. the vertical configuration: It seems then, that the 2nd half of the cycle on the vertical (where the current flow is coming out of the vertical element and into the radials) is practically worthless in terms of radiating signal into the 'ether'. At first thought it would appear that there is more efficiency with an elevated 1/4~ vertical element and using elevated radials and or counterpoise -vs- ground radials. Cecil, I can only offer thanks, but it is many thanks...! 73, dennis, k1drw |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 4:1 Current Balun Common Mode Impedance? | Antenna | |||
| Question on carbon fibre fishing rod | Antenna | |||
| Current across the antenna loading coil - from scratch | Antenna | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy (*sigh*) | Antenna | |||