Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... From: on Thurs, Dec 28 2006 6:04 pm wrote: Stefan Wolfe wrote: QRZ Search Results: There are 0 records matching +Stefan* +Wolfe* I guess no one cares that Stefan come on here bitchin and moaning and crying about the "dumbing down" of USA amateur radio, and he has no apparent license. How easily everyone gets fooled by these trolls. Maybe he got his given name spelled wrong? Like "Steppin Wolfe?" :-) Maybe this Stefan is really Mikey Deignan trying to get some new Club Calls to replace the ones taken away from him? :-) [the "KH6" is now a resident of Bedford, MA...no longer having a PO box in Hawaii courtesy of Jeff Herman] Hmmm...whatever happened to Eric June, the self-appointed president and director of "Know Code International?" :-) Hey Len, you've been flaming code on these groups since at least 1996...I can still remember when you got on the rec.radio groups the first time. Somehow, as a brilliant electronics engineer you were never able to master the skill of sending and receiving letters represented as dits and dahs and this kept you off HF...but you always had vastly superior academic skills in the field of RF that fact seemed to make the skill of simple Morse communication seem so irrelevant in today's modern world. Now you no longer need that skill and the doors have swung open. Does that mean you will make yourself and your brilliant mind available to the unwashed masses of hams who only know how to pound keys? Will you now be getting your extra class and dazzling us with new ideas and inventions that will forever modernize the amateur modes, you know, the sort of achievements you always said would be possible if only they got rid of that nasty Morse test? We will all be waiting Len. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just one note...I passed my code test and have not used it since. I am not
saying that I will never use it. I just have not had any interest in it yet. Does it make me a better ham haveing passed code? Joe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "merlin-7" wrote in message ... Just one note...I passed my code test and have not used it since. I am not saying that I will never use it. I just have not had any interest in it yet. Does it make me a better ham haveing passed code? Joe Perhaps in some ways. Keep in mind that in having passed it, you now know that you are able to learn this. Therefore should you wish to go further with this aspect of amateur radio in the future, you will have the confidence to tackle it and get it into usable shape. This gives you a great advantage over those that listened to the bull about it being "too hard" and thus were afraid to try and will probably continue to be afraid to try. Dee, N8UZE |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "merlin-7" wrote in message ... Just one note...I passed my code test and have not used it since. I am not saying that I will never use it. I just have not had any interest in it yet. Does it make me a better ham haveing passed code? Joe Perhaps in some ways. Keep in mind that in having passed it, you now know that you are able to learn this. Therefore should you wish to go further with this aspect of amateur radio in the future, you will have the confidence to tackle it and get it into usable shape. This gives you a great advantage over those that listened to the bull about it being "too hard" and thus were afraid to try and will probably continue to be afraid to try. Dee, N8UZE Then there's always the "bull" of people who learned it with difficulty. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() merlin-7 wrote: Just one note...I passed my code test and have not used it since. I am not saying that I will never use it. I just have not had any interest in it yet. Does it make me a better ham haveing passed code? Joe Joe, it doesn't. There are lots of 20WPM Code-Tape Extras - who've never had a single CW contact in their lives and never will. If a ham must be judged, judge him or her on their conduct and value that they add to the service. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "merlin-7" wrote in message ... Does it make me a better ham haveing passed code? Of course, your question is rhetorical and nobody knows if you are a good amateur, or a bad one, or what it might take to make you a better one.. Your might be a 75m late night quarmer or you might have provided significant radio communications for rescuers during the San Farncisco earthquake. Who knows? Passing the code test used to simply increase one's qualifications; it obviously did not in itself make one a better practitioner of the service. Now ,of course, passing code has no meaning at all; it is similar to Cecil Moore having passed the mensa test. Did passing mensa make Cecil a better engineer? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"merlin-7" wrote:
Just one note...I passed my code test and have not used it since. I am not saying that I will never use it. I just have not had any interest in it yet. Does it make me a better ham haveing passed code? I wouldn't say it makes you a better ham for having passed the code test. I would say it makes you a better ham because you are now familiar with another operating mode commonly in use in the amateur radio service. Likewise, I would make the same statement -- it makes you a better ham -- regardless of the mode of operation -- CW, SSB, FM, AM -- you name it. Why? As an amateur, experience with ANY mode of operation, IMO, makes you a "better" ham. 73 KH6HZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Stefan Wolfe wrote: wrote in message ups.com... From: on Thurs, Dec 28 2006 6:04 pm wrote: Stefan Wolfe wrote: QRZ Search Results: There are 0 records matching +Stefan* +Wolfe* I guess no one cares that Stefan come on here bitchin and moaning and crying about the "dumbing down" of USA amateur radio, and he has no apparent license. How easily everyone gets fooled by these trolls. Maybe he got his given name spelled wrong? Like "Steppin Wolfe?" :-) Maybe this Stefan is really Mikey Deignan trying to get some new Club Calls to replace the ones taken away from him? :-) [the "KH6" is now a resident of Bedford, MA...no longer having a PO box in Hawaii courtesy of Jeff Herman] Hmmm...whatever happened to Eric June, the self-appointed president and director of "Know Code International?" :-) Hey Len, you've been flaming code on these groups since at least 1996...I can still remember when you got on the rec.radio groups the first time. No you can't. There was no Stefan Wolfe here in 1996. And there is no amateur radio license issued to Stefan Wolfe. Somehow, as a brilliant electronics engineer you were never able to master the skill of sending and receiving letters represented as dits and dahs and this kept you off HF... Is that what's been keeping you off of HF? No license is issued to Stefan Wolfe. Odd, but Len has been on HF through SHF. All without code. but you always had vastly superior academic skills in the field of RF that fact seemed to make the skill of simple Morse communication seem so irrelevant in today's modern world. Len's knowledge of RF had nothing to do with it (sorry Len). Morse Code became irrelevant all by itself. Now you no longer need that skill and the doors have swung open. Does that mean you will make yourself and your brilliant mind available to the unwashed masses of hams There are no unwashed masses of hams. Maybe there are a few individuals at hamfests that might pay more attention to personal hygeine, but no masses. who only know how to pound keys? Welp, there are a bunch who know how to pound their chests. That's what the ARRL VP was saying when K4YZ attacked me. Will you now be getting your extra class and dazzling us with new ideas and inventions that will forever modernize the amateur modes, you know, the sort of achievements you always said would be possible if only they got rid of that nasty Morse test? How about if he does as much innovating as has N2EY, W3RV, K0HB, K8MN, and K4YZ. Hmmm? Did I leave Cecil off the list on purpose? We will all be waiting Len. We? You are trolls? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on Fri, Dec 29 2006 3:22 pm
Stefan Wolfe wrote: wrote in message From: on Thurs, Dec 28 2006 6:04 pm wrote: Stefan Wolfe wrote: Hey Len, you've been flaming code on these groups since at least 1996...I can still remember when you got on the rec.radio groups the first time. No you can't. There was no Stefan Wolfe here in 1996. And there is no amateur radio license issued to Stefan Wolfe. Maybe he was a UK ham troll then? Was I on that early? :-) I was on BBSs and doing letter- writing a lot earlier than that, over a decade before. Somehow, as a brilliant electronics engineer you were never able to master the skill of sending and receiving letters represented as dits and dahs and this kept you off HF... Is that what's been keeping you off of HF? No license is issued to Stefan Wolfe. Odd, but Len has been on HF through SHF. All without code. From VLF on up through 25 GHz...transmitting LEGALLY. :-) I've never described myself or even implied that I was a "brilliant electronics engineer." I've had lots of industry experience in radio-electronics since 1952 (military), then beginning 1956 (aerospace) in southern California. ONE radio- relevant US patent, 3848191, issued 1974. I had managed about 8 WPM in receiving morse code in the 60s, then thought about the uselessness of such effort seeing as I had worked in Big Time HF communications a decade earlier, all WITHOUT having to learn or to use any morse code. The minimal was then 13 WPM for a ham license. I'd already had 3 years of military experience, leading to operating team supervisor, on long-haul HF circuits across the Pacific and south to the Phillippines, using RTTY and SSB (multi-channel commercial kind) with some old-standard FAX plus being supervisor grade on multi-channel microwave radio relay equipment. So *WHY* was this old, old morse code so damn important to amateurs? Came to the conclusion they all wanted to just recreate a pioneering past where very few had participated, didn't really go in for the comradeship that was supposed to be in ham radio. Besides, CB had been created in 1958 and that was good for local communications. The Los Angeles area didn't lack for 'other communicators' in the early 1960s. :-) but you always had vastly superior academic skills in the field of RF that fact seemed to make the skill of simple Morse communication seem so irrelevant in today's modern world. Len's knowledge of RF had nothing to do with it (sorry Len). Morse Code became irrelevant all by itself. Where the fork do these TROLLS come from, Brian? :-( This twit obviously wants to FIGHT with words. Poor guy is already gunned down and carted off to Boot Hill but he not know it... On the other hand, I've memorized a few formulas a tad more complicated than Ohms's Law of Resistance...so that probably is "rocket science" to some amateurs. Now you no longer need that skill and the doors have swung open. Does that mean you will make yourself and your brilliant mind available to the unwashed masses of hams There are no unwashed masses of hams. Maybe there are a few individuals at hamfests that might pay more attention to personal hygeine, but no masses. Hmmm...the average ham mass is about 77 Kg. :-) Maybe the desk-bound contester is 10 Kilo more from sitting in front of his raddio for so long? :-) Just WHAT am I supposed to "make available" to those ham "masses?" Does Steppin Wolfe expect miracles from the brass-pounders who've tried to pound ME for years about their love for morse code? What happened to all the "smarts" among the brass-pounders? Why couldn't THEY do the "innovation" for their "unwashed" brethren? None of the brass-pounders seem to answer that. who only know how to pound keys? Welp, there are a bunch who know how to pound their chests. That's what the ARRL VP was saying when K4YZ attacked me. Some of those Mighty Macho Morsemen pound what they think are the chest mass of King Kong...but are still little code monkeys dancing to the manual morse organ of that publishing house in Connecticutt. I doubt many of them could climb even a few stairwells of the Empire State building in NYC...with or without biplanes buzzing around trying to shoot them. Will you now be getting your extra class and dazzling us with new ideas and inventions that will forever modernize the amateur modes, you know, the sort of achievements you always said would be possible if only they got rid of that nasty Morse test? Tsk, the Troll from the UK has strapped on his holsters and wants to walk down the street for a shoot-out... :-) Thinking back to what I've written in here, I've NOT said much about "achievements possible if the code test was removed." That wasn't my point. The code test for an AMATEUR radio license was just an anachronism, a left-over, something that mattered ONLY to the very old timers who had to take it (and therefore everyone else has to take it too). Amateur radio IS a fine, absorbing HOBBY pursuit. It should be open to ALL who can qualify for the license through the written tests. It is *NOT* nor should it ever have been some kind of Living Museum of Archaic Radio Technology. But, in the minds of the pro-coders, that's all it was...a Living Museum of Morsemanship. Morse code was NEVER an intellectual achievemnt, NEVER a 'technology.' It was, is, and will remain, just a psycho- motor skill acquired through hours of practice. It requires an APTITUDE for the on-off patterns similar to drumbeat rhythms. Some take a VERY long time to master it at slow speeds while others can learn quickly to achieve high rates. The OLD S25 of the ITU Radio Regulations had a political flavor to it...that of mandating adminstrations to test for morse code for licenses having "below 30 MHz privileges." Now "30 MHz" is an arbitrary choice. It is the top of the definition of the HF decade in the spectrum. The next- higher amateur radio band begins at 50 MHz and distance propagation isn't very good up there. The limit on 30 MHz APPEASED the old-timers in ham radio who regarded the ham HF bands as "theirs" and wanted to keep morse code in the very worst way. The International Amateur Radio Union saw the present-day realism and did not want to appease the old-timers or give in to their morse mythos. S25 got an almost total rewrite in 2003 to bring it up to relatively modern times. [S25 hasn't quite reached this new millennium yet but give it time...] Now, as to ORIGINAL INNOVATIONS, I can think of only TWO and both of those done by Brits: Peter Martinez for PSK31 and Mike Gingell for his R-C Polyphase Network used in SSB modulation-demodulation other than by more-expensive crystal filters. Those were new, original. Mike Gingell did his Polyphase network for a PhD in the UK before moving to USA. Martinez used Gingell's network in a ham transceiver application three decades ago and has continued to innovate things in HF radio. All the rest are ADAPTATIONS of EXISTING commercial applications in circuits and systems...some very good but still ADAPTATIONS, not ground-breaking new things. How about if he does as much innovating as has N2EY, W3RV, K0HB, K8MN, and K4YZ. W3RV, K8MN, and K4YZ will be LOST behind the front panel of any radio having semiconductors. N2EY now builds KITS using semiconductors...his last described tube rig was a kluge of tube circuits made from the equivalent of dumpster diving (minimal cost some kind of achievement). Hans probably can go behind the front panel and understand things since he remains working in true high-tech electronics (the only questions there is his being a 'manager,' a postion not always held has having real-savvy technical smarts by those working in the electronics industry). :-) Hmmm? Did I leave Cecil off the list on purpose? Cecil got tired of the self-righteous, self-important few morsemen on RRAP and inhabited RRAA. Cecil likes to try out antenna designs...and does some good things there from what I've read elsewhere. Cecil has more patents awarded than I...perhaps five (?) in all. We will all be waiting Len. We? You are trolls? They are...Steppin Wolfe and all the other anony-mousies eager to do Word War III in here. :-) FCC 06-178 will become LAW of the USA soon. Whatever follows (insofar as amateur radio is concerned) will happen. The "predictions" in here are just Guesses, suppositions based on individual's mode biases. What will be will be... Best regards, |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. | Policy | |||
What is the ARRL's thought on having good amateurs? | General | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB |