Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene wrote,
Cecil, This has become unusually entertaining. You have declared experimentation to be unnecessary, e.g., your Diamond antenna story. You have declared math models to be unnecessary and incorrect on numerous occasions. I have worked with a lot of scientists in my career; some were experimentally biased, some were theoretically biased, and many understood that both approaches were useful. However, I do not believe I have ever encountered a "scientist" who rejected both experimental and mathematical approaches at the same time. 73, Gene W4SZ Gene, people who come up with simple "my easy-to-understand, the-scientists-think- they-know-everything-but-don't" theories usually don't have much use for either mathematics or experimentation. Indeed, why should they? Since the theories they've thought up in their heads already explain everything, mathematics and experimentation are merely redundant. It's the same logic that was used to burn what was left of the library at Alexandria (after the Christians had destroyed most of it, already): everything you need to know is in the Koran, so these books are useless. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |