| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil wrote,
Dan Richardson wrote: wrote: I haven't been paying attention. Obviously The original posting made no assertions and was simply a URL which didn't respond when I tried to access it. The subsequent postings seemed to be concerned with radiation resistance so I didn't even read them. How does radiation resistance affect the loading coil discussion? It has already been proven that EZNEC's lumped circuit model doesn't work for Kraus' real world loading coils. What else is there to say? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp A lot. Besides, it hasn't been proven, at least not by you, that Kraus' loading coils work the way you seem to think they do. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
What the whole damn lot of you have forgotten is the electromagnetic
coupling which occurs between the antenna wire sections on either side of the phasing coils, especially when the adjacent wire sections are supposed to be in anti-phase with each other. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote: What the whole damn lot of you have forgotten is the electromagnetic coupling which occurs between the antenna wire sections on either side of the phasing coils, especially when the adjacent wire sections are supposed to be in anti-phase with each other. Yes, but soon we'll all have forgotten more than you ever knew. ;-) 73 de ac6xg |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg wrote,
What the whole damn lot of you have forgotten is the electromagnetic coupling which occurs between the antenna wire sections on either side of the phasing coils, especially when the adjacent wire sections are supposed to be in anti-phase with each other. Absolutely correct. No analysis is complete without taking that into account. I was hoping no one would bring that up, however, since I've been having too much fun goring Cecil's rather fragile ox. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tdonaly wrote:
Absolutely correct. No analysis is complete without taking that into account. I was hoping no one would bring that up, however, since I've been having too much fun goring Cecil's rather fragile ox. Don't you mean Kraus' "rather fragile ox"? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tdonaly wrote:
Besides, it hasn't been proven, at least not by you, that Kraus' loading coils work the way you seem to think they do. Kraus' phase-reversing coils work the way he says they do. A high impedance trap blocks current if it is looking into a low impedance because it is a high impedance. But if it is looking into a high impedance, like a 1/2WL element, it simply reverses the phase of the current, like a quarter-wave shorted series stub. Would you like me to send you the EZNEC files that demonstrate the phase reversal using stubs or multiple sources? -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cec sez Kraus . . . .
================== Still worshipping Kraus then Ces? ;o) |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
Cec sez Kraus . . . . ================== Still worshipping Kraus then Ces? ;o) Not worshipping, Reg, just respecting. He's one of the few references I have for BBQ'ing those sacred cows. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg wrote,
Cec sez Kraus . . . . ================== Still worshipping Kraus then Ces? ;o) He can't work out the proofs himself so he has to appeal to a higher authority and hope it all comes out right. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tdonaly wrote:
He can't work out the proofs himself so he has to appeal to a higher authority and hope it all comes out right. I hope that Kraus is right. You hope that Kraus is wrong. Guess which hope has the highest probability of being true? I have presented a reference with which I agree. Now it is your turn to present a reference that disagrees with Kraus. Good luck on that one. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
| A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||