Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 09:33 PM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil wrote,

Dan Richardson wrote:

wrote:
I haven't been paying attention.


Obviously


The original posting made no assertions and was simply a URL
which didn't respond when I tried to access it. The subsequent
postings seemed to be concerned with radiation resistance so I
didn't even read them. How does radiation resistance affect the
loading coil discussion? It has already been proven that EZNEC's
lumped circuit model doesn't work for Kraus' real world loading
coils. What else is there to say?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


A lot. Besides, it hasn't been proven, at least not by you, that
Kraus' loading coils work the way you seem to think they do.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 09:54 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What the whole damn lot of you have forgotten is the electromagnetic
coupling which occurs between the antenna wire sections on either side of
the phasing coils, especially when the adjacent wire sections are supposed
to be in anti-phase with each other.


  #3   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 10:58 PM
Jim Kelley
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Reg Edwards wrote:

What the whole damn lot of you have forgotten is the electromagnetic
coupling which occurs between the antenna wire sections on either side of
the phasing coils, especially when the adjacent wire sections are supposed
to be in anti-phase with each other.


Yes, but soon we'll all have forgotten more than you ever knew. ;-)

73 de ac6xg
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 30th 04, 03:10 AM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg wrote,

What the whole damn lot of you have forgotten is the electromagnetic
coupling which occurs between the antenna wire sections on either side of
the phasing coils, especially when the adjacent wire sections are supposed
to be in anti-phase with each other.


Absolutely correct. No analysis is complete without taking that into account.
I was hoping no one would bring that up, however, since I've
been having too much fun goring Cecil's rather fragile ox.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #5   Report Post  
Old January 30th 04, 04:05 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tdonaly wrote:
Absolutely correct. No analysis is complete without taking that into account.
I was hoping no one would bring that up, however, since I've
been having too much fun goring Cecil's rather fragile ox.


Don't you mean Kraus' "rather fragile ox"?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 10:11 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tdonaly wrote:
Besides, it hasn't been proven, at least not by you, that
Kraus' loading coils work the way you seem to think they do.


Kraus' phase-reversing coils work the way he says they do.
A high impedance trap blocks current if it is looking into
a low impedance because it is a high impedance. But if it
is looking into a high impedance, like a 1/2WL element, it
simply reverses the phase of the current, like a quarter-wave
shorted series stub. Would you like me to send you the EZNEC
files that demonstrate the phase reversal using stubs or
multiple sources?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

  #7   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 11:44 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cec sez Kraus . . . .
==================
Still worshipping Kraus then Ces? ;o)


  #8   Report Post  
Old January 30th 04, 12:08 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
Cec sez Kraus . . . .
==================
Still worshipping Kraus then Ces? ;o)


Not worshipping, Reg, just respecting. He's one of the few
references I have for BBQ'ing those sacred cows.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #9   Report Post  
Old January 30th 04, 03:17 AM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg wrote,

Cec sez Kraus . . . .
==================
Still worshipping Kraus then Ces? ;o)



He can't work out the proofs himself so he has to
appeal to a higher authority and hope it all comes out
right.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #10   Report Post  
Old January 30th 04, 04:17 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tdonaly wrote:
He can't work out the proofs himself so he has to
appeal to a higher authority and hope it all comes out
right.


I hope that Kraus is right. You hope that Kraus is wrong.
Guess which hope has the highest probability of being true?
I have presented a reference with which I agree. Now it is
your turn to present a reference that disagrees with Kraus.
Good luck on that one.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
current/inductance discusion Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 54 January 4th 04 08:08 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 11:06 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 03:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017