LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 08:33 PM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cecil wrote,

Dan Richardson wrote:

wrote:
I haven't been paying attention.


Obviously


The original posting made no assertions and was simply a URL
which didn't respond when I tried to access it. The subsequent
postings seemed to be concerned with radiation resistance so I
didn't even read them. How does radiation resistance affect the
loading coil discussion? It has already been proven that EZNEC's
lumped circuit model doesn't work for Kraus' real world loading
coils. What else is there to say?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


A lot. Besides, it hasn't been proven, at least not by you, that
Kraus' loading coils work the way you seem to think they do.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
current/inductance discusion Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 54 January 4th 04 07:08 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017