Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil wrote,
Dan Richardson wrote: wrote: I haven't been paying attention. Obviously The original posting made no assertions and was simply a URL which didn't respond when I tried to access it. The subsequent postings seemed to be concerned with radiation resistance so I didn't even read them. How does radiation resistance affect the loading coil discussion? It has already been proven that EZNEC's lumped circuit model doesn't work for Kraus' real world loading coils. What else is there to say? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp A lot. Besides, it hasn't been proven, at least not by you, that Kraus' loading coils work the way you seem to think they do. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |