Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 28th 04, 01:24 AM
Butch
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Several years ago I put up an 80mtr loop without taking down my inverted
V. The loop sorta surounded the V. and I did have an improved
receive and transmit signal on it. When I lowered the V down to ground
level I couldn't tell any difference in the loop. So, if it's ok on 80
it oughta be ok for 160 whether you use one or both at the same time.

Try it, only cost you a little time.

Butch KF5DE

Metalhead wrote:

I am thinking about building a small receiving loop for 160 meters. I
can probably only get the loop about 50 feet or so away from my
transmitting antenna (inverted L.) My questions a

1) Is this spacing to close?
2) Does spacing this close effect the radiation pattern for the
transmitting Inverted L?
3) Is the only drawback to this close spacing a nosier receiving
loop?

Would just like some opinions before I go through the trouble of
building the loop. The particular loop design I am looking at is the
KC2TX receiving loop.

Thanks for any opinions, positive or negative.

Burch
K4QXX


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ten-tec vee beam Tom Coates Antenna 8 September 21st 03 12:47 AM
Active antenna combiner (transmit & receive), 30-87 MHz Stefan Moscibroda Antenna 0 August 24th 03 08:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017